My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.0. EDSR 05-09-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2005
>
05-09-2005
>
5.0. EDSR 05-09-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2016 4:11:40 PM
Creation date
2/2/2016 4:11:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
5/9/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consider Development of Twin Lakes Business Park <br /> May 9,2005 EDA Meeting <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> • Ehlers &Associates has completed a preliminary TIF estimate that indicates that there <br /> appears to be sufficient TIF that could be generated to fund either the entire park or phase I <br /> improvements if all of the lots were built-out at the time the improvements are installed as <br /> envisioned on the concept plan. However,it is not realistic to believe such an aggressive <br /> build-out therefore there is a time lag that would create additional expenses since TIF <br /> revenues are typically not available until 18-24 months following project construction. <br /> The EDA could consider one of the following options ranging from the most financial risk <br /> to the least financial risk: <br /> 1) Recommend the Council improve the entire park through an improvement bond at <br /> an estimated cost of$1.3-million with lots available for construction late fall 2005. <br /> 2) Recommend the Council improve Phase I of the park through an improvement <br /> bond at an estimated cost of$750,000 with lots available for construction late fall <br /> 2005. <br /> 3) Recommend the Council complete minimal improvements and cost estimated at <br /> $250,000 to get a few lots available for construction late fall 2005 and TIF revenues <br /> generated to complete additional improvements (Option 2 listed on Page 5 of the <br /> draft feasibility study). <br /> • 4) Recommend the Council complete plans and specifications for the entire <br /> development or phase I improvements and market for first identified user(s),but do <br /> not bid or begin construction until there is at least one significant lot development <br /> proposed (Option 1 listed on Page 5 of the draft feasibility study). <br /> 5) Market for development,but do not complete plans/bid improvements until the first <br /> significant lot development is proposed. <br /> In considering the least amount of financial risk and the most flexible plan for marketing and <br /> development of the park, staff recommends that the EDA consider option#4 or 5 listed <br /> above. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.