Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION <br /> s� MixesVolume 4.Issue 1 Industrial <br /> February,2005 <br /> / In the previous issue of the Minnesota Eco- Forthose intrigued,more detail will follow <br /> nomic Development Center newsletter,the inside this newsletter. <br /> i . topic of weekly wages was explored. The <br /> discussion raised further questions about the <br /> t._ structure of wages and industries in Minne- The data reveals differences between the <br /> y sota. This newsletter will address some of economic structure in out-state Minnesota <br /> those questions,particularly the differences versus the Twin Cities. In out-state Minne- <br /> ;,, '; between industries in out-state Minnesota sota,there are few manufacturing estab- <br /> versus those in the Twin Cities metropolitan lishments. However,those manufacturers <br /> area. The data in this article is from Cov- are major employers in the region. Fur- <br /> „ ` Bred Employment and Wages(CEW). For ther,they pay relatively high wages. In <br /> .: , 1 more on CEW data and collection,see page contrast,in the Twin Cities Professional <br /> three. and Business Service businesses are promi- <br /> nent. The industry has both a high number <br /> of establishments and employment. How- <br /> �' Covered Employment and Wage data cov- ever,most notable is its large contribution <br /> lW ers the number of establishments,employ- to total wages. At the same time,the Pro- <br /> "' ment and total wages by industry and by fessional and Business Services industry in <br /> county. This level of detail makes CEW out-state Minnesota has many establish- <br /> 1i p 4. data a treat for data hounds(such as the au- ments,but does not contribute significantly <br /> ,,. ,--`24.-W4,-,74-,"°` thor),but can overwhelm first time users. to total wages. <br /> With that in mind,this article will start with <br /> F a brief summary of the information gleaned. (Continued on page 2) <br /> 1i : <br /> Chart 1: Establishments by Industry, Twin Cities, <br /> 2003 <br /> NR/Wining <br /> Q 0.3% Construction <br /> Other Services <br /> J Leisure and ° 9.8% <br /> Hospitality 9.2/0 <br /> 7.9% g <br /> Manufacturin <br /> y�r�,, <br /> i � ' 6.0% <br /> Ed/Heafth <br /> cl vr:„ -::%;%:-i, ., ,,,..,:;,-,r,:;;.14: 9.0% <br /> 22.2% <br /> # Prof/Business Information <br /> 20.9% 2.0% <br /> 'ctiVRies <br /> 4 12.8% <br /> Chart 2: Establishments by Industry, Non-Metro <br /> Minnesota, 2003 <br /> jil <br /> NWMining ittlt <br /> Other Services. Construction <br /> Leisure and 2.5% <br /> Hospitality 8.2% 13.3% <br /> 9.8% <br /> o„ Ed/Health Manufacturing <br /> 7.6% 5.6% <br /> • <br /> Z rru <br /> z Prof/Business2 <br /> Fina iafs` 30.2% <br /> 11.5% Activitie dation <br /> 9.2% 2.0% <br />