My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.1 PCSR 01-26-2016
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2016
>
01-26-2016
>
8.1 PCSR 01-26-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 12:36:18 PM
Creation date
1/22/2016 12:34:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
1/26/2016
case
CU 16-02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The existing cul-de-sac and right-of-way is proposed to be modified to accommodate surface parking <br /> north of the building,which is pushed to the west side of the parcel and as close to the bluff line as <br /> possible. The proposed bluff line setback is zero feet. <br /> The extension of Yale Court will likely include a land swap with the bank property to accommodate <br /> proposed roadway geometrics. The buildable section of the parcel,after accounting for road right-of-way, <br /> is approximately three-quarters of an acre and will require creativity on behalf of the city and developer to <br /> fit the program on site. <br /> Landscaping <br /> With such a small site, there are minimal opportunities for landscaping. However, the developer plans to <br /> include a green roof and minimize impervious surface areas as much as possible. During the PUD <br /> process staff will work with the developer to identify potential landscape opportunities. <br /> Building <br /> The entire building will be constructed with the most up to date building materials and techniques to <br /> ensure top tier efficiency and promote sustainability. The building includes five levels above ground and <br /> two levels of parking below ground. The narrative identifies a potential for geo thermal heating and <br /> cooling, solar panels above street parking and on the rooftop, and numerous "smart" technologies to <br /> manage building systems. <br /> Parking <br /> The current plan includes a total of 199 parking spaces. There are additional on street parking <br /> opportunities which may able to count towards required commercial parking spaces. Ordinance <br /> requires approximately 275 parking spaces, depending on the retail space configuration. With this small <br /> parcel,parking is a significant concern and the applicant is exploring additional opportunities for parking. <br /> Staff will continue working with the applicant on the parking concerns and the PUD process will allow <br /> flexibility if a reduced parking demand can be identified. <br /> Stormwater <br /> City ordinance requires that new developments treat all runoff to a degree that existing runoff rates and <br /> volumes are not exceeded.The applicant is utilizing a number of best practices like green roofs and <br /> permeable pavements to treat and reduce runoff on site,but additional control structures are required. <br /> The applicant proposes expanding the city's stormwater pond north of the site to treat runoff generated <br /> by the development. The pond currently treats runoff from the city streets between Yale Ct and the north <br /> end of the townhome development. Additionally, the feasibility study for the extension of Yale Court and <br /> construction of the frontage road along Highway 10,identifies a need to expand the pond for treatment <br /> of runoff generated by the new city street. On January 20, 2016, the applicant submitted a narrative <br /> describing alternative treatment locations for runoff from the new city street. The alternatives have been <br /> reviewed with the City Engineer and the city does not support the proposed alternatives. The city <br /> currently owns the locations where additional ponding is proposed, and with the expenses already <br /> associated with the project cannot support increasing the costs for additional property needed for <br /> alternative ponding sites. The applicant addressed these concerns in the attached narrative January 20, <br /> 2016. <br /> The Planning Commission is asked to review the staff report and the applicant's narratives and responses <br /> against potential impacts to the area, comfort with deviations from the zoning ordinance,and the benefits <br /> the project would bring to the city. <br /> \\dc3-clkr\shared\Departments\Community Development\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 16-02 Modem Construction\CU 16-02 SR Modem <br /> Construction 1-26-2016.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.