My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-2004 CC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
09-13-2004 CC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:56 AM
Creation date
10/8/2004 10:29:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
9/13/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City COUIlcil Minutes <br />September 13, 2004 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />-----~-~--------------------- <br /> <br />Councilmember Dietz felt tbat we should move forward and ask tbe architect that did the <br />last store for a quotation for services. <br /> <br />Councilmember Morin agreed and felt we need to move ahead. <br /> <br />Councilmember Tveite stated tbat we need to look at tbe comer lot and see if land swap is a <br />possibility. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuester started tbat whenever you start any new business there will be a <br />loss and feels we need to go forward. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated tbat she is not in favor of a second liquor store and tbat she feels tbe <br />City should not be in the liquor store business. She questioned the location. She stated that <br />perhaps this store should be located downtown. She stated that she would not vote in favor <br />of this proposal. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN TO GET A QUOTE FROM TUSHIE- <br />MONTGOMERY AND TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF A SECOND LIQUOR STORE. MOTION CARRIED 4-1 (Klinzing opposed). <br /> <br />It was the consensus of tbe Council to contact Mr. Hartman about the comer lot being <br />available. <br /> <br />5.5 Consider Tax Lew Resolutions and Discuss 2005 Budget <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers gave an overview of the staff report explaining tbat the Council <br />had decided on September 7,2004, tbat tbere should be no city tax rate increase for next <br />year. It was also noted that cuts in expenditures in the amount of $112,500 would be made <br />from the draft budget tbat was presented on August 23, 2004. <br /> <br />He stated that tbe City Council on September 7,2004 also decided tbat it would levy the <br />maximum available provided tbat no city tax rate increase takes place. The council decided <br />tbat available funds, based on a 16.1 % increase in the city net tax capacity, would be used <br />mainly for staff additions. Staff additions for 2005 include seven full-time and two part-time <br />positions. It was also decided if possible, to move some equipment items into the general <br />fund. The tax levy amount becomes $7,623,985.00 and tbe general fund budget is <br />$9,281,915.00. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing stated that she feels it is very important not to have a tax rate increase. She <br />feels that the comparisons with other surrounding cities and metro cities indicated that we <br />are in a good position. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson stated tbat tbe net tax capacity provided from Sherburne County is an estimate. <br />This estimate was used to determine tbe amount of levy possible witbout increasing tbe tax <br />rate. Ms. Johnson informed the Council tbat tbe final net tax capacity usually changes <br />slightly and tbat tbe tax rate would change accordingly. <br /> <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER TVEITE AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 04-71 AUTHORIZING <br />THE PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR COLLECTION IN 2005. <br />MOTION CARRIED 5-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.