7.1. SR 01-04-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes January 17,2006 Page 2 • 3.6. PURCHASE OF TWO MOWERS IN THE AMOUNT OF $103,556 FROM THE 2006 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT BUDGET 3.7. PURCHASE TWO TRUCKS IN THE AMOUNT OF $152,677.33. 3.8. AMEND AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ELK RIVER AND SCHOOL DISTRICT #728 FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS FACILITY USE TO REFLECT THE MEETING START TIME OF 7:00 P.M, ON THE SECOND MONDAY OF EACH MONTH. 3.9. CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS FOR MARCH 27,2006,6:30 P.M., AT CITY HALL FOR ANNUAL REPORT PRESENTATION AND APRIL 24,2006,6:30 P.M., AT SHERBURNE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, FOR BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MOTION CARRIED 5-0. ••v ,a Mike Starr -Introduced himself as a candidate running for the Senate District 48 seat, Councilmember lefotin stated he is also running for candidacy to the same seat on the Republican ticket. 5.1. 7,abuuy Egpansion Presentation-KKE Architects Mr. Maertz introduced Sara Weiner and Jenny Anderson -Tuttle from KKE Architects who • prepared the site feasibility study for the Elk River Public Library. Ms. Tuttle reviewed the site locations and the process KKE used to determine that Site C, located across from City Hall, south of Orono Parkwav, would be the best choice for a new Library location. Two other locations were also considered: Site A, the current Library location, and Site B, on the north side of City Hall. Councilmember Motin expressed some mncems with the criteria KKE used in determining Site C as the best location. He stated Site C got higher rankings on some of the criteria when some of the other sites seem to have received the same score or less. He provided the following examples: each sites visibility to Highway 10, each sites pedestrian access to the Library, and each sites potential for expansion. He stated he felt the visibility of Site A would be better then the other two sites but Site C got a better score for visibility. Ms. Tuttle stated as far as the expansion potential, Site C scored the same as Site B but due to the linear size of Site C and the water table issues on Site B, Site C ranked higher. She stated Site C would be easier to work with from a design standpoint Ms. Weiner stated that some interpretations can be subjective. Councihnember Morin questioned if the architects considered expanding upward on the existing Library (Site A). Ms. Weiner stated it is not desirable to expand upward due to additional staffing needs, security, accommodation of citizens, and trying to keep families together.