Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br /> The public benefits of economic development, including an increase in tax <br /> base,tax revenues, employment, or general economic health, do not by <br /> themselves constitute a public use or public purpose. <br /> Minn.Stat.§315.42.City or State law limits the ability of cities to condemn land owned by religious <br /> Jordan v.Church of St John <br /> the Baptist,764 NW 2d 71 corporations without their consent. <br /> (Minn.Ct.App.2009). <br /> U.S.Const.Amend.V. A city can also be compelled to condemn land by a court order in an inverse <br /> Minn.Const.art.1§ 13. <br /> Lucas v.South Carolina condemnation action. A property owner can bring this claim when a city's <br /> Coastal Council,505 U.S. action has had the effect of depriving the property owner of some or all of <br /> 1003,112 S.Ct.2886(1992). <br /> Penn Cent. Transp.Co,v. their interest in the property. <br /> City of New York,438 U.S. <br /> 104,98 S.Ct.2646(1978). <br /> Wensmann Realty,Inc.v.City <br /> of Eagan,734 N.W.2d 623 <br /> (Minn.2007). <br /> See Handbook,Chapter 14. The eminent domain procedure is rather complex and will not be discussed <br /> in detail in this document. A city council that is considering using eminent <br /> domain to acquire land or an easement should consult with its city attorney <br /> for guidance. <br /> 1. Relocation assistance <br /> Both state and federal law protect property owners and tenants who are <br /> required to move because of eminent domain. Relocated persons must be <br /> paid relocation costs. <br /> 42 U.S.C.§§4601-4655. Federal law provides that the condemning authority must pay certain <br /> benefits to people who are displaced from their homes, farms, or businesses <br /> as a result of a federally funded project. <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 117.52. Minnesota law also requires the payment of relocation benefits when <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 117.52,subd. <br /> la. eminent domain is used, even if no federal funding is involved. The nature <br /> 49 C.F.R.§24.304. and amount of these benefits is the same as if federal funds were involved. <br /> For purposes of relocation benefits paid by a city under state law, federal <br /> law is applicable to the reimbursement of reestablishment expenses for <br /> nonresidential moves, except that a city must reimburse the displaced <br /> business for expenses actually incurred up to a maximum of$50,000. <br /> Minn.Stat.§ 117.52. Even if the sale of real estate to a city is negotiated, a city may have a <br /> responsibility to pay relocation costs. In such situations, most contracts <br /> include a specific waiver of additional relocation costs,because these costs <br /> are usually already included in the contract price, or specify the amount of <br /> the relocation benefits to be paid. <br /> League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/2 212 01 5 <br /> Purchase and Sale of Real Property Page 5 <br />