My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
1993-1999
>
1998
>
03-10-1998 SPECIAL
>
2.0. HRSR 03-10-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:40:55 PM
Creation date
12/2/2015 2:40:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
3/10/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The ability to revitalize the downtown and riverfront areas will be directly Finance Tools and <br /> influenced by the ability of both public and private parties to obtain and make Resources <br /> effective use of the available financial resources. At this point in time, it is <br /> impossible to create an complete "plan" to finance the revitalization efforts. <br /> The activities that require public support will occur over a number of years. <br /> The actual design of public improvements and the scope of development pro- <br /> jects influence the cost of implementation. A variety of factors affect the <br /> availability of revenues and the financial feasibility of projects. Financing the <br /> Downtown Plan requires a framework for making decisions about the use of <br /> financial resources. The framework provides guidance on financing actions <br /> needed to implement the Plan and the flexibility to tailor these actions to meet <br /> the needs of projects as they occur. Several broad principles create the founda- <br /> tion for financing the Plan: <br /> • Financial resources are limited. The use of resources must be targeted to <br /> make the greatest effect on the implementation. <br /> • Decisions must balance current need with future implications. Use of <br /> current resources may reduce monies available in the future. Does this <br /> action lay the foundation for future steps? Does the investment in a cur- <br /> rent opportunity lead to additional revenues in the future? <br /> • It is likely that critical actions (redevelopment of the Mall, development <br /> of the riverfront, reconstruction of Walnut Street) will face funding gaps <br /> -- project costs exceeding readily available revenues. The ability to fill <br /> the gaps will be a key to implementation. <br /> • Tax increment financing MO is an essential funding tool. TIF provides <br /> funding without taking general funds away from public and private <br /> sources. <br /> • • While this section focuses on public finance, the Plan cannot become <br /> reality without private investment. The use of public funds should be <br /> targeted to actions that encourage private investment in downtown <br /> Monticello. <br /> •Oi{ <br /> b R <br /> . <br /> x+= - <br /> Implementation of the revitalization plan touches on many areas of downtown;each has varying implications with different <br /> underlying strategies for revitalization. <br /> The remainder of this section discusses the application of these principles to <br /> promote the revitalization of downtown Monticello and the implementation of <br /> the Plan. The financing of the Plan consists of this section, which identifies <br /> the finance tools and resources, and the following section, which links those <br /> tools to actual implementation. <br /> The implementation of the Plan will involve four broad areas of activity: Tools and Resources <br /> • Construction of public improvements and facilities. <br /> • <br /> A New Bridge <br /> Revitalizing Monticello's Downtown and Rlverfiont - <br /> Page 4:11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.