My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.0. 7.0. 8.0. HRSR 01-27-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
1993-1999
>
1997
>
01-27-1997
>
6.0. 7.0. 8.0. HRSR 01-27-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2015 2:07:13 PM
Creation date
11/19/2015 2:07:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
1/27/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. the tax increment revenues for taxes payable in the current calendar year; <br /> II5. whether the tax increment financing plan or other governing document permits increment <br /> revenues to be expended outside of the tax increment financing district; <br /> 6. any additional information that the State Auditor may require. <br /> Copies of this report must also be provided to the county and school district boards. <br /> Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL <br /> Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, before or at the time of approval of the <br /> tax increment financing plan, the municipality shall make the following findings and shall set forth in <br /> writing the reasons and supporting facts for each determination. <br /> 1. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 is a redevelopment district as defined <br /> in Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175, Subd. 10. <br /> District No. 16 consists of 3 parcels of property. The District qualifies as a redevelopment <br /> district as defined in Minnesota Statutes,section 469.174, subd. 10. 1 <br /> 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council and the Authority, <br /> would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and <br /> that the increased market value of the site that could reasonable be expected to occur without the <br /> use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to <br /> result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax <br /> • increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the plan. <br /> Due to the high cost of redevelopment on parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, <br /> the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed <br /> improvements,is, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment <br /> financing. <br /> 3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development <br /> or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. <br /> The site is appropriately zoned. The Tax Increment Financing Plan has been reviewed by the <br /> Planning Commission and been found to conform to the general development plan of the City. <br /> 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 will <br /> afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the <br /> development of Development District No. 1 by private enterprise. <br /> The establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 will result in increased <br /> employment for the City and will eliminate a blighting influence in the downtown area. <br /> Z. COUNTY ROAD COSTS <br /> Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision la, the county board may require the <br /> authority to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be <br /> • Tax Increment Financing District No.16 Page 11-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.