My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1B PCSR 11-24-2015 DRAFT MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2015
>
11-24-2015
>
4.1B PCSR 11-24-2015 DRAFT MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2015 1:37:04 PM
Creation date
11/18/2015 1:37:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
11/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustments Minutes Page 2 <br /> October 27,2015 <br /> Brent Christenson,applicant,explained why it was not possible to move the house location, <br /> due to the unique site constraints,including elevations,trees,and wetlands,which impacted <br /> the primary and secondary septic locations and location of the driveway. <br /> Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> The Board of Adjustments reviewed the five criteria for the driveway variance as follows: <br /> 1. Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Thiel that <br /> the request meets Criteria#1. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> 2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Konietzko and seconded by Commissioner <br /> Christianson that the request meets Criteria#2. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> 3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br /> zoning ordinance <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Thiel that <br /> the request meets Criteria#3. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> 4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a <br /> consequence of the petition's own action or inaction. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Konietzko and seconded by Commissioner <br /> Christianson that the request meets Criteria#4. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> 5. The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Crook <br /> that the request meets Criteria#5. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> The Board of Adjustments reviewed the five criteria for the single-family home variance as <br /> follows: <br /> 1. Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Konietzko and seconded by Commissioner <br /> Christianson that the request meets Criteria#1. Motion carried 6-0. <br /> 2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Larson-Vito and seconded by Commissioner Thiel that <br /> the request meets Criteria#2. Motion carried 6-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.