My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-02-2015 CCM
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Minutes
>
City Council 1974 - Present
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
11-02-2015 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 10:44:51 AM
Creation date
11/17/2015 10:41:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
11/2/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 4 <br />November 2, 2015 <br />10.2 Lake Orono Right -of -Way Access <br />Mr. Leeseberg presented the staff report. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated the advantage to keeping the access is in case the <br />city ever needs to access the lake from the opposite side of where it currently has <br />access. He agrees that once the access is given up the city could never get it back. <br />Mayor Dietz stated this request is unique in that the public is asking for access to the <br />lake. <br />Councilmember Westgaard noted most people most likely don't know there is land <br />accessible to the lake. <br />Mayor Dietz questioned if there is a way to maintain the driveway and still allow the <br />public to have access to park. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated it would be a tight fit to allow public to park on the driveway. <br />Councilmember Wagner stated if she lived here she feels it would cause issues fox <br />the adjacent homeowner's if the access was opened up to the public. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated there are two issues: <br />1. Whether the city is comfortable with giving up access to the land by vacating <br />it; and <br />2. if the city keeps the right-of-way, how does it handle access. <br />Attorney Beck stated because there is an application requesting the city vacate this <br />parcel it should wait until the public hearing before getting involved with too many <br />specifics. He stated the Council should consider why it may be good to maintain this <br />access on the south side of the lake and highlighted the example of when the lake <br />was dredged and trucks were hauling away material. He stated the city would have <br />some options available to them if they decide not to vacate the right-of-way, such as <br />a formal agreement or licensing agreement with the adjacent owner, or opening it up <br />and establishing rules for public access. <br />Attorney Beck suggested the Council provide staff direction regarding the <br />establishment of criteria on a broader basis for all the water accessible right-of-ways. <br />He stated in most cases it is in the public's interest to keep the easement but the city <br />may want to consider setting up criteria on how they are allowed to be used. <br />Mayor Dietz stated each of the right-of-ways should be evaluated to determine <br />whether they make sense to keep. <br />POV 1111 B1 <br />NATURE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.