My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.0. HRSR 11-25-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
1993-1999
>
1996
>
11-25-1996
>
5.0. HRSR 11-25-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 4:15:51 PM
Creation date
11/9/2015 4:15:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
11/25/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• E. CLASSIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT <br /> The City and the Authority, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in <br /> accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 to 469.179, as amended, inclusive, find that <br /> District No. 16 to be established is a redevelopment district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section <br /> 469.174, Subdivision 10 as defined below: <br /> (a) "Redevelopment district"means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of <br /> a project, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that <br /> one of the following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists: <br /> (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by <br /> buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements and more than 50 percent <br /> of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a <br /> degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;or <br /> (2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or <br /> infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated <br /> railroad rights-of-way. <br /> (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing <br /> defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and <br /> facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and <br /> condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of <br /> sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. <br /> • A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building <br /> code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building <br /> code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure <br /> of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a <br /> building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding <br /> sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and <br /> age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs <br /> or other similar reliable evidence. If the evidence supports a reasonable <br /> conclusion that the building is not disqualified as structurally substandard, the <br /> municipality may make such a determination without an interior inspection or an <br /> independent, expert appraisal of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the <br /> building... <br /> (c) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities <br /> or other improvements until 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains <br /> improvements. <br /> The parcels have been investigated by City and Authority staff and consultants and District No. 16 <br /> has been found to meet all requirements of a redevelopment district. <br /> 1. District No. 16 consists of 3 parcels. <br /> 2. An inventory of the parcels shows that at least 70 percent of the parcels are occupied as <br /> defined in the Act. <br /> 3. An inspection of the buildings located within District No. 16 finds that at least 100 percent <br /> • of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the Act. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.