My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. SR 08-23-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
08/23/2004 - SPECIAL
>
2.0. SR 08-23-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:55 AM
Creation date
8/20/2004 8:06:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~l,gus! 23, 2004 Page 2 of 5 <br />Budget Memo <br /> <br />One final note on the 2004 budget is that with what we have already approved for unbudgeted <br />expenditures in 2004, our flexibility in incurring additional expenses is becoming limited. <br /> <br />2005 REVENUES <br />On August 9, I indicated to the City Council that revenues would be going up in the neighborhood <br />of $1.1 million based on increases in three major areas and not too many other changes of <br />significance being made. The three major changes are in taxes, Local Government Aid (LGA), and <br />growth related revenues. As a reminder, when I refer to gro~vth related revenues I am talking about <br />building permits, plumbing/heating permits, and plan check fees. <br /> <br />The estimated increase of $1.1 million is still reasonably close. As you know, LGA is going up <br />$393,650 in 2005. Also, the growth related revenues are being projected at 75% of the actual amount <br />received in 2003. This means an increase of $226,400 or 25.5% in 2005 from the budgeted amount <br />in 2004. The area of greatest flexibility for the City Council is in the taxes amount that is dedicated <br />to the general fund, especially since there are no levy limits for 2005. For discussion purposes, the <br />draft budget shows a $500,000 increase in taxes for general fund activities. <br /> <br />Please see the attached preliminary levy sample as provided by the Finance Department. The current <br />city tax rate is 43.78%. This preliminary levy sample shows that with a NTC increase of 10% and no <br />tax rate change at the city level, then $701,117 of additional taxes can be generated. (This is the <br />combined total of the new levy amount of $582,402 near the top of the net levy list and the <br />"variance from the proposed tax levy" amount of $118,715 under the 10% NTC increase section.) <br />Of the total, I have put $500,000 of additional taxes in the general fund and the other $201,117 is <br />proposed for streets and 2005 equipment certificates. The actual amounts for each of these three <br />categories still needs to be determined and NTC information is needed in order to make a decision <br />about where our tax level and tax rate should be for next year. It is anticipated that the NTC <br />information ~vill be available from the county around the end of August. <br /> <br />Please see the attached budget revenue worksheets which show the actual revenues received from <br />the past five years and the August 23 revenue worksheet detail pages on the 2005 proposal. Total <br />revenues at this time are proposed in the amount of $8,912,400. This is a $1,037,000 or 13.2% <br />increase over the adopted 2004 budget. It should be noted that the 2004 budget included the use of <br />$117,000 from the fund balance and that no such use of the fund balance is in the 2005 proposal <br /> <br />In early 2004, the City Council approved a resolution which allocated some of the 2003 general fund <br />year and balance for capital equipment and pay adjustments. Some of this allocation may need to be <br />put into the 2005 budget so that the wage adjustments that were recendy given by the City Council <br />can be absorbed over a two-year period. <br /> <br />2005 EXPENDITURES <br />Please refer to the expenditure summary sheets by categories for an overview of the changes within <br />each department and to the August 23 budget worksheets for more details on some of these <br />requested changes. <br /> <br />In looking at the supplies, other services/charges, and the capital outlay/transfer categories <br />combined, the requested increase is 24.3% or $480,150. (This is close to the $500,000 increase used <br />as an estimate at the August 9 Council worksession.) We need to look at some of these requested <br />increases in detail as we may not be able to afford everything that is being proposed. In the end, the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.