My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />38 <br />the gateway theory is often treated as a straightforward scientific theory, its emergence <br />is rather more complicated. In effect, it is a hybrid of popular, academic and media <br />accounts – a construct retroactively assembled rather than one initially a rticulated as a <br />coherent theory” [22]. <br /> <br />Despite these serious and fatal flaws in the arguments, the use of the term ‘gateway’ is <br />commonplace both in the academic literature and the lay press, particularly in relation to <br />EC use and whether EC are a gateway to smoking. Some have suggested that if EC <br />use increases at the same time as smoking increases then EC are acting as a gateway <br />to smoking. Similarly, it’s been argued that if someone uses an EC first and then <br />initiates smoking, EC are a gateway. These arguments are clearly erroneous. To give <br />one example of the misuse of the gateway concept, a BMJ news item on the Moore et <br />al., 2014 [18] cross-sectional study discussed above commented that “[EC} could be a <br />gateway into smoking” [25]. <br /> <br />Kandel recently argued that evidence from mice offers a biological basis for the <br />sequence of nicotine to cocaine use in people [26], but there is limited evidence for this. <br />In reality, the gateway theory is extremely difficult to test in humans. For example, a <br />clean test of the gateway hypothesis in relation to EC and smoking would require <br />randomising people to an environment with EC and one without, and th en following <br />them up over a number of years to assess uptake of EC and smoking. <br /> <br />We strongly suggest that use of the gateway terminology be abandoned until it is <br />clear how the theory can be tested in this field. Nevertheless, the use of EC and <br />smoking requires careful surveillance in young people. The preferred option is that <br />young people do not use EC but it would be preferable for a young person to use an EC <br />instead of smoking, given the known relative risks of the EC and smoking cigarettes <br />[10]. <br /> <br />Summary <br />Since EC were introduced to the market, smoking prevalence among adults and youth <br />has declined. Hence there is no evidence to date that EC are renormalising smoking, <br />instead it’s possible that their presence has contributed to further declines in smoking, <br />or denormalisation of smoking. The gateway theory is ill defined and we suggest its use <br />be abandoned until it is clear how it can be tested in this field. Whilst never smokers are <br />experimenting with EC, the vast majority of youth who regularly use EC are smokers. <br />Regular EC use in youth is rare. <br /> <br />Summary of findings <br />Adults: Around one in 20 adults in England (and Great Britain) use EC. Current EC <br />users are almost exclusively smokers (~60%) or ex-smokers (~40%), that is smokers
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.