My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />8 <br />Summary of Chapter 3: UK policy framework <br />The revised TPD will introduce new regulations for EC or refill containers which are not <br />licensed by the MHRA. The cap on nicotine concentrations introduced by the TPD will <br />take high nicotine EC and refill liquids off the market, potentially affecting heavier <br />smokers seeking higher nicotine delivery products. <br /> <br />The fact that no licensed EC are yet on the market suggests that the licensing route to <br />market is not commercially attractive. The absence of non-tobacco industry products <br />going through the MHRA licensing process suggests that the process is inadvertently <br />favouring larger manufacturers including the tobacco industry, which is likely to inhibit <br />innovation in the prescription market. <br /> <br />Policy implications <br />o From May 2016, following the introduction of the revised TPD, ECs will be more <br />strictly regulated. As detailed elsewhere in the report, the information we present <br />does not indicate widespread problems as a result of EC. Hence, the current <br />regulatory structure appears broadly to have worked well although protecting non- <br />smoking children and ensuring the products on the market are as safe and effective <br />as possible are clearly important goals. New regulations currently planned should <br />be implemented to maximise the benefits of EC whilst minimising these risks. <br /> <br />o An assessment of the impact of the TPD regulations on the UK EC market will be <br />integral to its implementation. This should include the degree to which the <br />availability of safe and effective products might be restricted. <br /> <br />o Much of England’s strategy of tobacco harm reduction is predicated on the <br />availability of medicinally licensed products that smokers want to use. Licensed ECs <br />are yet to appear. A review of the MHRA EC licensing process therefore seems <br />appropriate, including manufacturers’ costs, and potential impact. This could include <br />a requirement for MHRA to adapt the processes and their costs to enable smaller <br />manufacturers to apply, and to speed up the licensing process. The review could <br />also assess potential demand for the EC prescription market and what types of <br />products would be most appropriate to meet that demand. <br /> <br />Summary of Chapter 4: Prevalence of e-cigarette use in England/Great Britain <br />Adults: Around one in 20 adults in England (and Great Britain) use EC. Current EC <br />users are almost exclusively smokers (~60%) or ex-smokers (~40%), that is smokers <br />who now use EC and have stopped smoking altogether. EC use among long-term ex- <br />smokers is considerably lower than among recent ex-smokers. Current EC use among
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.