Laserfiche WebLink
10 <br />nicotine products in England concluded 36: <br />Evidence conflicts with the view that electronic cigarettes are undermining tobacco control or <br />‘renormalizing’ smoking, and they may be contributing to a reduction in smoking prevalence <br />through increased success at quitting smoking <br />The more plausible and obvious hypothesis is that e-cigarettes will function as an alternative to <br />smoking; a gateway exit from smoking, and will normalise safer alternatives to smoking. <br />Marketing that looks like cigarette marketing. There have been some objections that some e- <br />cigarette advertising looks like cigarette advertising 37. In fact it is not surprising or undesirable that <br />some advertising looks this way: the advertisers are appealing to smokers to switch smoking <br />behaviour to an alternative to smoking that very much les harmful. If the similar branding adds to <br />the effectiveness of the appeal to smokers, then it is contributing to better health. Note that the use <br />of tobacco brands in e-cigarette marketing (“brand stretching”) is illegal in Europe and most <br />jurisdictions where tobacco advertising is banned – so the only visible brands are rivals to cigarettes. <br />A recent code published in the UK controls e-cigarette advertising in much the same way as alcohol <br />advertising is controlled – this is a proportionate approach 38 and contrasts favourably with the near <br />complete ban to be imposed by the European Union. <br />3.2.2 Reduced quitting <br />Where this has been studied properly and the results interpreted correctly, there is no sign of e- <br />cigarettes reducing quitting, and nor would a neutral observer expect one 39. The most thorough <br />survey in the world, the Smoking Toolkit Survey for England 40, concluded in January 2015, that: Rates <br />of quitting smoking are higher than in previous years. E-cigarettes may have helped approximately <br />20,000 smokers to stop last year who would not have stopped otherwise. <br />3.2.3 Gateway effects <br />Many activists and some public officials have pointed to rising e-cigarette use among adolescents <br />and suggested they pose a ‘gateway’ risk: that they will lead to more smoking. There is no evidence <br />supporting this hypothesis anywhere. In fact e-cigarettes appeal primarily to existing smokers and <br />the ‘value proposition’ they offer is strongest among existing smokers with mounting concern about <br />the health and other costs. This expectation is confirmed by data. For example, the UK Office for <br />National Statistics states 41: <br />E-cigarettes are used almost exclusively by smokers and ex-smokers. Almost none of those <br />who had never smoked cigarettes were e-cigarette users. <br />However, this has not stopped wild misinterpretations of data. For example in 2013, much media <br />coverage was created in the United States over National Youth Tobacco Survey Data showing a rise <br /> <br />36 West R. Brown J, Beard E. Trends in electronic cigarette use in England. Smoking Tool Kit Study. 13 June 2014 [link] <br />37 See for example: Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, 7 Ways E-Cigarette Companies Are Copying Big Tobacco’s Playbook <br />[link] and de Andrade M & Hastings G, The marketing of e-cigarettes: a UK snapshot, BMJ Blog 6 April 2013 [link] <br />38 Committee on Advertising Practice, Advertising Code: Electronic Cigarettes, [non-broadcast][broadcast] <br />39 Letter to WHO Director General Margaret Chan: The importance of dispassionate presentation and interpretation of <br />evidence. 26 June 2104. A letter from 50 scientists addresses some of these claims in more detail [link] <br />40 West R. Brown J, Beard E. Trends in electronic cigarette use in England. Smoking Tool Kit Study. 15 January 2015 [link] <br />41 ONS, Opinions and Lifestyle Survey, Adult Smoking Habits in Great Britain, 2013, 25 November 2014 [link]