My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
completely from tobacco to e-cigarettes achieves much the same in health terms as does <br />quitting smoking and all nicotine use completely. Furthermore… risks associated with <br />passive exposure to e-cigarette vapour are far less than those associated with passive <br />exposure to tobacco smoke.’ <br />If influential health officials were to make these points repeatedly, public sentiment towards <br />e-cigs would shift quickly. And this could be done at the same time as strengthening anti- <br />smoking measures. <br />We should praise ‘good’ e-cig companies who commit to safety, to avoiding youth <br />marketing, and to making smoking obsolete. They need to be explicit about their long-term <br />plans. Are they seriously committed to harm reduction, or introducing new products simply <br />to delay progress and confuse policymakers, as many in public health believe? <br />From my meetings with major tobacco companies, it’s clear that they are hedging their bets. <br />Some of them have indicated, in private, a long-term goal of moving out of manufacturing <br />harmful tobacco products — but these statements are not enough to inspire trust. Tobacco <br />companies’ intention to change must be stated publicly and backed by action. <br />Other market sectors need to adapt to the reality of e-cigs as a force for good. Retailers <br />should voluntarily withdraw cigarettes from stores, or at least reduce their prominence, in <br />favour of e-cigs and NRTs. CVS Health has yet to offer e-cigs, despite the fact that they work <br />better than pharmaceutical products. Life insurers still treat e-cig users as regular smokers <br />when they calculate premiums. This is short-sighted and misses a golden opportunity to <br />spell out the benefits of quitting smoking and the positive impact of switching to e-cigs on <br />people’s longevity. <br />At the moment, it’s estimated that there will be a billion tobacco-related deaths before 2100. <br />That is a dreadful prospect. E-cigs and other nicotine-delivery devices such as vaping pipes <br />offer us the chance to reduce that total. All of us involved in tobacco control need to keep <br />that prize in mind as we redouble efforts to make up for 50 years of ignoring the simple <br />reality that smoking kills and nicotine does not. <br />A toxic legacy
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.