My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
09-08-2015
>
10.2. SR 09-08-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2015 8:11:45 AM
Creation date
9/4/2015 7:59:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/8/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E-cigarettes: an evidence update <br /> <br />88 <br />significantly lower in Australia than in the UK in 2013, the use of EC increased at the <br />same rate in Australia and the UK between 2010 and 2013 [183]. <br /> <br />Canada took a similar approach to regulating EC as Australia by prohibiting the sale of <br />EC with nicotine through existing laws. However, a recent House of Commons report <br />stated that the current regulatory approach was not working to restrict access to EC with <br />nicotine [184]. Canada has now put forward recommendations to develop a new <br />legislative framework for EC that would most likely allow the sale of EC with nicotine <br />[184]. There has been only one population-level survey of EC use in Canada. The 2013 <br />Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey (CTADS) of Canadians 15 years and <br />older found that 9% had ever tried an EC, with trial being higher among young people <br />aged 15–19 years at 20% [185]. Use in the past 30 days was lower at 2%, with past 30 <br />day use being higher among young people aged 15–19 years at 3%. Of those who tried <br />an EC, 55% stated the EC did not contain nicotine, while 26% reported it did contain <br />nicotine, with 19% reporting uncertainty. Whether the EC they tried contained nicotine is <br />uncertain given (1) the ban on the sale of EC with nicotine, and (2) reports that many <br />EC sold and bought in Canada are labelled as not containing nicotine but actually <br />contain nicotine [184]. Although it is difficult to make comparisons due to different <br />survey methods and questions, the percentage of young people (15–19 years) who <br />have tried EC in Canada (20%) is roughly similar to the percentage who have tried EC <br />in GB in 2014 (reported at 8%, 15%, 18%, and 19%, for ages 15 to 18, respectively). <br /> <br />Summary of findings <br />Although EC use may be lower in countries with more restrictions, these restrictions <br />have not prevented EC use. Overall, use is highest among current smokers, with low <br />numbers of non-smokers reporting ever use. Current use of EC in other countries is <br />associated with being a smoker or ex-smoker, similar to the findings in the UK. EC use <br />is frequently misreported, with experimentation presented as regular use. Increases in <br />youth EC trial and use are associated with decreases in smoking prevalence in all <br />countries, with the exception of one study from Poland. <br /> <br />Policy implications <br />o Future research should continue to monitor and evaluate whether different EC <br />policies across countries are related to EC use and to smoking cessation and <br />smoking prevalence. <br /> <br />o Consistent and agreed measures of trial, occasional and regular EC use among <br />youth and adults are urgently needed to aid comparability. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.