My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.9. SR 08-16-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
08/16/2004
>
6.9. SR 08-16-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:54 AM
Creation date
8/13/2004 1:07:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/16/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
An analysis of Elk River's functionally classified road system (i.e. its arterials and collectors) <br />revealed that Elk River is overly dependent on its Principal Arterials, TH 10 and TH 169, for <br />vehicular movement in the city. It also revealed that the city lacks a sufficient number of miles of <br />Minor Arterial and Collector Roads. <br /> <br />Based on examination of the spacing of Minor Arterial and Collector Roads in Elk River, it was <br />determined that two main land areas that lack Minor Arterials. The first area runs east-west <br />across the northern fringe of the urban service area (water and sewered area) in Elk River. CR 33 <br />is the major roadway running continuously through this area. The second land area lacking a <br />Minor Arterial is on the eastern boundary of the city. The land area has a north-south <br />orientation. CR 40 and Jarvis Street are the primary north-south roadways within this land area. <br />However, there is a gap in these roadways due to presence of the Cargill land holdings. Figure ii <br />displays the areas lacking Minor Arterial and Collector Roads. <br /> <br />A total of four different land areas were identified as lacking Collectors. Only one of the land <br />areas, located on the western edge of the city, has a north-south orientation. CR 72 is the <br />primary north-south roadway in this area. This roadway does not extend south of Elk River <br />however. The three remaining land areas have an east-west orientation. CR 35 in the southwest <br />corner of the city runs through one of the areas. One other area lacking Collectors is east of TH <br />169 and runs east-west to CSAH 13. Unlike many of the other areas, this area currently does not <br />have a continuous east-west roadway running through it. The closest candidate is 198~ Avenue. <br />The last land area lacking Collectors is in the southeast corner of the city. The area runs east- <br />west and includes 165~ Avenue. These areas are also depicted in Figure ii. <br /> <br />A review of city, county, and state ownership of roadways in Elk River revealed that several <br />county roadways in the city are not classified as an Arterial or Collector Road. The county <br />roadways that were not classified as an Arterial or Collector Road are as follows: <br /> <br />· CSAH <br />· CR 33 <br />· CR 40 <br />· CR 77 <br />· CR 35 <br />· CR 44 <br />· CR 72 <br /> <br />21 (Brook Rd, 221't Ave) <br />(Ranch Rd, 205~h Ave, Quincy Ave, 209th Ave) <br />(Cleveland Ave, Davis St) <br />(Proctor Rd, 213~ Ave) <br />(192nd Ave) <br />(Meadow-vale Rd, Upland Ave) <br />(Zebulon St) <br /> <br />The implication of this is that these roadways should either be turned over to the city or <br />upgraded in status to an Arterial or Collector Road. The city should begin discussions now with <br />Sherburne County regarding what future changes in ownership and classification should take <br />place on major roadways in Elk River. <br /> <br />Elk River <br />Draft Transportation Plan Update iii <br /> <br /> August 2003 <br />Howard R. Green Company <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.