Laserfiche WebLink
Figure vii displays the long-term (2019-2025) improvement actions. The improvement actions <br />identified here involve the implementation (construction) of several new roadway <br />connections/extensions and improvements to TH 169 north of CR 33 and TH 10 west of TH <br />169. Once again, it should be noted that the timing for many of these improvements is <br />dependent on development occurring in the vicinity of the proposed corridors. In order to <br />implement these improvements in the long-term timeframe, the alignments and geometric design <br />of the roadways will need to be determined and environmental documentation may need to be <br />completed during the short and medium-term timeframes. Also, funding for these <br />improvements will have to be identified in advance. To do this, coordination with Sherburne <br />County and Mn/DOT should begin as soon as possible so that these projects can be included as <br />part of the respective agencies short and long-range planning efforts. <br /> <br />In the spring of 2002, Mn/DOT completed corridor management plans (CMP's) for TH 10 and <br />TH 169 through Elk River. The two plans identify a number of deficiencies along the two <br />highways and contain project concepts for alleviating these deficiencies. In the fall of 2002, the <br />city council passed a resolution on each of these plans that states Elk River recognizes the <br />significance .of these corridors and endorses the vision for laid out for them. However, the city <br />documented the issues and concerns it has with both plans. These issues would have to be <br />addressed before the city could agree to future improvements to the two highways. <br /> <br />The deficiencies identified and the traffic forecasts developed in this transportation plan for TH <br />10 and TH 169 are very consistent with those found in the respective CMP's. This implies that <br />the project concepts identified in the CMP's would likely help to eliminate/minimize the traffic <br />safety and operational issues identified in this plan. However, these solutions cannot be <br />implemented without first addressing the concerns laid out by the city in their resolutions for the <br />respective plans. <br /> <br />In the fall of 2002, Sherburne County drafted a Functional Class and CSAH Assessment Study <br />for its county road system. The study recommends creating continuous east-west Minor Arterials <br />and/or Collectors at roughly 1-2 mile intervals through the city and also calls for continuous <br />north-south collectors and arterials at the eastern and western edges of-the city. The study also <br />recommends upgrading CR 33 to CSAH status along with CR 32 and 72 on the western edge of <br />the city and CR 40/Fillmore/Jarvis on the eastern side of the city. This transportation plan is <br />consistent with the findings and recommendations drafted in the Sherburne County Study. <br /> <br />ROADWAY PLANNING GUIDELINES <br /> <br />In addition to examining the existing and future roadway conditions within Elk River, a series of <br />roadway planning guidelines were developed. These guidelines are intended to assist the city in <br />providing a high level of traffic safety and mobility on their roadway system. The guidelines <br />cover a range of issues that the city has contended with in the past. Specifically, they cover such <br />topics as: <br /> <br />Access and signal spacing <br />Right-of-Way widths <br />Stop sign installation <br />Traffic Impact Studies <br />Temporary Dead-End Signing <br /> <br />Guidelines, procedures, and/or examples of the state of the practice are discussed for each of <br />these topics in Chapter 5.0 of the main document. <br /> <br />E/k River <br />Draft Transportation P/an Update xii <br /> <br /> August 2003 <br />Howard R. Green Company <br /> <br /> <br />