Laserfiche WebLink
~lugust 9, 2004 Page 2 of 6 <br />Budget Memo <br /> <br />2005 Revenues <br />In an ideal world, the city would look at expenditures first and identify the level necessary in <br />order to provide adequate services. However, we are not living in an ideal world and <br />revenues to fund expenditures are limited; especially as it relates to additional tax revenues. <br /> <br />Last year the city Net Tax Capacity 0NTC) increased by 12%. I__f for next year the growth in <br />the city NTC is about 10% and there is not a substantial increase in the city tax levy for <br />non-general fund activities, then the city should be able to increase taxes for general fund <br />activities by about $500,000 with a very minimal impact on the city tax rate. This general <br />fund tax amount is one which could vary sigmficanfly; depending on the levy for non-general <br />fund activities such as equipment and the pavement management program; depending on <br />the level of expenditures for personal services, supplies, capital outlay, and other <br />services/charges; and depending on where the City Council comfort level is with the city tax <br />rate. <br /> <br />The city needs to certify the proposed maximum levy to the county by September 15, 2004, <br />and hopefully the city will know its growth in NTC by this date. This information on the <br />NTC is provided by the county. We need both the NTC and tax amount figures in order to <br />determine whether or not the city tax rate goes up or down. For 2005 there is no state <br />imposed levy limits placed on municipalities. Accordingly, the City Council can establish the <br />tax amount (and rate) at any level that is deemed best in order to provide necessary <br />municipal services. <br /> <br />Per legislative intent, Local Government Aid (LGA) is increasing. The city will receive a total <br />of $686,820 in LGA in 2005. This is a $393,696 increase from our 2004 LGA allotment. <br />(The 2005 LGA amount is still about approximately $250,000 below the city LGA amount <br />that was received in 2002.) All in all, this 2005 LGA figure is clearly good news. <br /> <br />The city experienced record residential growth in 2003. Staff is projecting 2005 growth <br />related revenues at 75% of the actual amounts received in 2003. Comparing the 2004 <br />adopted budget with the 2005 proposed budget shows an increase of $226,400 or 25.5% in <br />building permits, plumbing/heating permits, and plan check fees. This is a substantial <br />increase and we are always watching the residential market for any trends that may show a <br />slowing down in housing starts. <br /> <br />Overall, with the increases in LGA, growth related activities, and taxes, we can guesstimate <br />that the 2005 revenues will be in the neighborhood of $9 million, which would be an <br />increase of approximately $1.1 million or 14%. <br /> <br />The above tax amount figure and the following expenditure estimates are my rough ballpark <br />figures and have not been reviewed by the Finance Department. These estimates are for <br />discussion purposes only. Estimates that you can rely on from the Finance Department will <br />be available for the August 23, 2004 worksession. <br /> <br />S:\Council~Pat~Budget~2005\080904wrksn.doc <br /> <br /> <br />