My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5. SR 08-28-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2000
>
08/28/2000
>
4.5. SR 08-28-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:50 AM
Creation date
6/28/2004 8:35:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/28/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W. ADMINISTRATION OF DISTRICT AND MAINTENANCE OF THE TAX INCREMENT <br /> <br />ACCO U NT <br /> <br />Administration of District No. 21 will be handled by the City. The tax increment received as a <br />result of increases in the tax capacity of District No. 21 will be maintained in a special fund <br />separate from all other municipal funds and expended only upon sanctioned municipal activities <br />identified in the tax increment financing plan. <br /> <br />X. FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Pursuant to the applicable sections of Minnesota Statutes, the City will report on TIF District No. <br />21. <br /> <br />Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL <br /> <br />The City of Elk River hereby makes the following findings: <br /> <br />Finding that the Tax Increment Financing District No. 21 is an economic development <br />district as defined in Minnesota Statutest Section 469.174, Subd. 12. <br /> <br />District No. 21 consists of one parcel of property. The District is in the public interest <br />because it will result in increased employment in the State, and it will result in preservation <br />and enhancement of the tax base of the State. <br /> <br />Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City' Council, would not <br />occur solely' through private investment within the reasonably' foreseeable future and that <br />the increased market value of the site that could reasonable be expected to occur without <br />the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value <br />estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of <br />the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of District No. 21 permitted by' the <br />Tax Increment Financing Plan. <br /> <br />Due to the high cost of development on the parcel, and the cost of financing the proposed <br />improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment <br />financing. <br /> <br />A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of <br />Tax Increment Financing District No. 21 and the use of tax increments has been performed <br />and is presented below. <br /> <br />Tax Incrermnt Financing District No. 21 Page II-10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.