Laserfiche WebLink
Budget <br />~0u~st 1, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />What makes the situation especially worrisome is that the 2001 budget does <br />not include any additional police officers and the request for police vehicles is <br />down from $136,000 in 2000 to $69,000 i~ 2001. At this time, which is very <br />early in the budget process, we are appro ~imately $468,900 apart between <br />projected revenues and requested expend itures. Most of the City Council <br /> <br />decisions to close the budget gap will rela <br />terms of personal services (additional em <br />(mostly vehicles and equipment), and con <br />new city programs and services. The met] <br />will be the same as before and will requir <br />reserves, budget cuts, and some decisions <br />budget rather than waiting until next ye~ <br /> <br />REVENUES <br /> <br />The 2001 General Fund Revenues are pr( <br />This represents a 4 percent or $236,250 <br />budget. <br /> <br />Taxes... Overall this category is projecte, <br />$237,650 to a total of $3,593,750. (This in <br /> <br />In projecting the General Fund tax levy r <br />rate of 30.248 percent and assumed a 5 p, <br />capacity (NTC). The city will not get a Nq <br />mid to late August. I expected a higher re <br />be conservative in the first go-around. Afl <br />items from the total in the tax levy resolu <br />Fund tax levy amount of $3,542,757. ThL, <br />General Fund tax levy increase. Compari <br />budgets, over the last six years the Gene~ <br />averaged over $317,000 per year. <br /> <br />Licenses and Permits... Overall this ca' <br />percent or $10,750 to a total of $467,350. <br /> <br />There are three significant changes to nol <br />liquor licenses, so this revenue is up $7,0~ <br /> <br />te to city priorities, especially in <br />?loyees), capital outlay items <br />tinuing, expanding, or establishing <br />hods to solve the budget problem <br />e additional tax revenue, use of city <br />to finance requests out of the 2000 <br />Lr. <br /> <br />ected in the amount of $6,098,750. <br />crease over the adopted 2000 <br /> <br />to increase by 7 percent or <br />'.ludes the gravel tax.) <br /> <br />~venues, staff used the 2000 city tax <br />.~rcent growth in the net tax <br />!C estimate from the county until <br />te of growth, but felt that we should <br />;er deducting the other tax levy line <br />tion, we were left with a General <br />represents a 7 percent or $231,650 <br />~g adopted budgets to adopted <br />al Fund tax levy increase has <br /> <br />;egory is projected to decrease by 2 <br /> <br />;e. The city has issued two more <br />)0. Based on 90 percent of the prior <br /> <br />year actual figures, the building permits ~re down $12,200 and the <br />plumbing/heating permits are down $7,200. This is due to the 1999 actuals <br />being less than the 1998 actuals. <br /> <br />Intergovernmental Revenues... Overall this category is projected to <br />increase by 1.7 percent or $17,150 to a total of $1,033,250. <br /> <br /> <br />