My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 07-24-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2000
>
07/24/2000
>
5.2. SR 07-24-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:49 AM
Creation date
6/28/2004 1:21:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/24/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Speed and Speed Management - Turner-Fairbank.. Page 16 off 25 <br /> <br />to reduce injury crashes in Boise. The STEP publicity program was designed to inform the driving <br />public of hazardous road locations, the types of driver actions that made these locations unsafe, <br />and the traffic enforcement that would be used to alleviate the problems at these locations. The <br />PI&E program portrayed the Boise Police Department as genuinely interested in increasing public <br />safety, as opposed to simply citing motorists and collecting fines. STEP advisory messages were <br />broadcast twice a day over three local radio stations. The implementation of STEP in Boise was <br />associated with a significant 17 percent reduction in the number of injury crashes; a non-STEP <br />control area experienced no similar change. More important, the change in Boise was most <br />dramatic following the delayed implementation of the STEP PI&E campaign (publicity began one <br />month after the start of aggressive traffic enforcement). Besides the Boise STEP efforts, <br />successful speed enforcement programs using speed indicators and photo-radar have been <br />attributed to well-mounted PI&E pro-grams (Hamalainen and Hassel, 1990; Cameron, Cavallo <br />and Gilbert, 1992). <br /> <br />The Impact of Speed Enforcement on Crime <br />The deterrent effects of police practices on crime have been a topic of research and debate for <br />several years. The 1974 report describing the impact of the Kansas City Preventive Patrol <br />Experiment (Kelling, et al., 1974) was an early evaluation of the effect on crime of in-creasing or <br />decreasing police personnel. No significant differences in the incidence of crime, citizen fear of <br />crime, or satisfaction with police services were found between Kansas City, Missouri, neighbor- <br />hoods varying in levels of enforcement. The Kansas City study was criticized for only examining <br />variations in force size and not taking into account the type of police strategies used in combating <br />crime. <br /> <br />In response to the Kansas City study, Wilson and Boland (1978) developed a model predicting <br />that police techniques that maximize the level of interaction between the police and the <br />community (termed aggressive policing) will result in a reduction in crime. To support their model, <br />they examined the historical incidence of robbery in 35 large American cities and found that <br />robbery rates were lower in cities in which more traffic citations were written (their measure of <br />aggressive policing). Despite criticism of the measure of aggressiveness used by Wilson and <br />Boland (Jacob and Rich, 1981), similar historical research by Sampson and Cohen (1988) <br />supports the model developed by Wilson and Boland. Weiss, et al. (1993) employed quasi- <br />experimental methodology to directly manipulate the level of traffic enforcement and measure its <br />impact on local area crime. Local crime levels in areas treated with traffic enforcement were <br />compared to locations where no enforcement took place. No relationship was found between <br />traffic enforcement levels and the prevalence of crime in the experimental sites. While the <br />researchers postulate that traffic enforcement may indeed have no impact on crime, they also <br />recognize several flaws in their research that may have made such an effect undetectable. <br /> <br />Stuster's (1995) study of municipal speed enforcement examined the effects of municipal traffic <br />enforcement methods on a variety of dependent measures. In addition to measures of traffic <br />safety, reported previously, the incidence of crimes in the special zones was analyzed for a <br />control and two experimental communities. Overall, serious crimes (e.g., murder, rape, robbery, <br />assault, burglary, larceny, arson, and motor vehicle theft) declined by eight per-cent in the special <br />enforcement zones of one of the experimental communities, and by one percent in the other <br />experimental community. Less serious crimes (e.g. drug violations, vandalism, disorderly <br />conduct, and prostitution) increased by four per-cent in the comparison community's control <br />zones. None of the changes in serious crimes as a whole was statistically significant, but both <br />experimental communities experienced significant declines in the incidence of the larceny and <br />theft. This is the one type of crime equally likely to occur during nighttime as well as daylight <br />hours (i.e., when the special enforcement was conducted). Analyses found the 11 and 12 per- <br />cent declines in larceny and theft to be statistically significant and attributable to the deterrence <br />effects of the special enforcement programs; larceny/theft declined less than 2 percent statewide <br />and increased by 4 percent in the control zones of the comparison community <br /> <br />ENGINEERING MEASURES <br /> <br />Traffic calming techniques are street design or regulatory features that cause motorists to be <br />more attentive to their surroundings and to drive more slowly; some traffic calming techniques <br />are designed to induce motorists to select an alternate route. Techniques range from the <br /> <br />http://www.ntl.bts.gov/ntl/DOCS/speed/speed.htm 07/19/2000 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.