Laserfiche WebLink
Synthesis of Safety Research Related to Speed and Speed Management - Turner-Fairbank.. Page 5 of' 25 <br /> <br />The relationship between travel speed and the severity of injuries sustained in a crash was <br />examined by Solomon (1964), who reported an increase in crash severity with increasing vehicle <br />speeds on rural roads. From an analysis of 10,000 crashes, Solomon concluded that crash <br />severity increased rapidly at speeds in excess of 60 mi/h (96 kin/h), and the probability of fatal <br />injuries increased sharply above 70 mi/h (112 km/h). <br /> <br />Bowie and Waltz (1994), in an analysis of tow-away crashes reported in the National Accident <br />Sampling System over a 7-year period, found that the chance of being injured in a crash <br />depended on the change in speed at impact (DV). As shown in table 1, the risk of a moderate or <br />more serious injury was less than 5 percent when DV was less than 10 mi/h (16 km/h) and <br />increased to more than 50 percent when DV exceeds 30 mi/h (48 km/h). <br /> <br />Table 1. Injuries per 100 Occupants by Change in Speed (DV) at Impact <br /> <br /> Moderate Injury Serious Injury <br />deltaV <br /> AlS 2+ AlS 3+ <br /> <br />mi/h NCSS NASS NCSS NASS <br /> <br />1-10 2.4 4.5 0.7 1.0 <br /> <br />11-20 9.5 10.6 3.5 2.6 <br /> <br />21-30 25.3 29.2 13.9 11.1 <br /> <br />31-40 51.8 53.4 37.2 27.9 <br /> <br />41-50 70.3 67.2 58.3 40.6 <br /> <br />50+ 64.7 69.3 56.9 54.3 <br /> <br />1 mi/h = 1.61 km/h <br /> <br />Joksch (1993) found that the risk of a car driver being killed in a crash increased with the change <br />in speed to the fourth power as shown in figure 5. The risk of a fatality begins to rise when the <br />change in speed at moment of impact exceeds 30 mi/h (48 km/h) and is more than 50 percent <br />likely to be fatal when DV exceeds 60 mi/h (96 km/h). The probability of death from an impact <br />speed of 50 mi/h (80 km/h) is 15 times the probability of death from an impact speed of 25 mi/h <br />(40 kin/h). <br /> <br />The fatality risk curve from an earlier study by O'Day and Flora (1982) is also shown for <br />comparison. The shift in the curve to the right can be explained in part by improvements in <br />vehicle crashworthiness, seat-belt use, and emergency medical care over time. (See TRB, 184; <br />Evans, 1991; Zador and Ciccone,1991; and FORS, 1992). <br /> <br />Probability of Fatality ]'The relationship between impact speed and <br /> crash severity is particularly critical for <br /> ,,4 pedestrians, the most vulnerable road users. <br /> y =(x In a recent review of the issues, the European <br /> Transport Safety Council (1995) report that <br /> --- Joksch, 1993 ,only 5 percent of pedestrians died when <br /> ~ O'Day and Flora, 1982 jfl struck by a vehicle traveling at 20 mi/h (32 <br /> km/h); however, the proportion of fatalities <br /> ncreased to 45 percent at 30 mi/h (48 kin/h) <br /> and to 85 percent at 40 mi/h (64 km/h). <br /> /~ I Kloeden et al. (1997) compared the estimated <br /> speeds of over 150 cars involved in non- <br /> alcohol related injury crashes in 60 km/h <br /> speed zones in Australia with the free speed <br /> of cars measured at the same location at the <br /> same time of day and day of week. The pre- <br /> <br />http://www.ntl.bts.gov/ntl/DOCS/speed/speed.htm 07/19/2000 <br /> <br /> <br />