My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.13. SR 06-19-2000
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2000
>
06/19/2000
>
6.13. SR 06-19-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:47 AM
Creation date
6/24/2004 8:25:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/19/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the Mayo & City Council/OA 00-6 <br />June 5, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />portion does not. The retail portion would fit if the underlying land use was Highway <br />Business, but the primary function would then not be permitted. <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to allow limited retail sales as an accessory in the Business <br />Park District when the underlying land use is Light Industrial if the following conditions <br />are met: <br /> <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br /> <br />The sales are not located within an administrative office or commercial <br />sales building. <br />No more than 15% of the gross floor area is to be used for retail sales. <br />The retail sales are accessory to the principle use. <br />No signs identifying the retail use would be visible from the outside of the <br />building. <br /> <br />Staff would add the following changes: <br /> <br />The total area of the retail sales would not exceed 5,000 square feet. <br />The retail sales needs to be related to the product or primary use of the <br />building and would be clearly subordinate to the principle use. <br /> <br />The proposed amendment would allow certain flexibility for staff when "hybrid" uses are <br />proposed for the Business Park, but continue to preserve the intent of the Business <br />Park District, that of increasing tax base and jobs. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action <br /> <br />The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the ordinance <br />amendment at its May 23, 2000 meeting. No one spoke for or against the request. The <br />Commission voted to recommend approval of the amendment as recommended by <br />staff. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Staff recommends that the City Council approve the ordinance amendment as provided <br />by staff. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.