My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. HRSR 11-25-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
11-25-2002
>
7.1. HRSR 11-25-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 12:26:51 PM
Creation date
8/27/2015 12:26:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
11/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • Building accessibility—Minnesota Accessibility Code <br /> • Building egress, building construction —Uniform Building Code <br /> • Fire protection systems—Uniform Building Code <br /> • Food service—Minnesota Food Code <br /> • Energy code compliance —Minnesota Energy Code <br /> • HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning)— Uniform <br /> Mechanical Code <br /> • Electrical systems —National Electric Code and Minnesota Energy <br /> Code <br /> Office evaluations—Following the on-site evaluation,each building was then <br /> reviewed,based on on-site data, age of construction, building usage and <br /> occupancy, square footage, and known improvements (from building permit data), <br /> and an assessment was made regarding compliance with current mechanical, <br /> electrical, and energy codes. A basic code review was also completed regarding <br /> the potential need for additional egress (basement stairways, for example), <br /> sprinkler systems, or elevators. <br /> Deficiency Cost—Costs to correct identified deficiencies were determined by <br /> using R. S. Means Cost Data and our professional judgement and experience. <br /> Actual construction costs are affected by many factors (bidding climate, size of <br /> project, etc.). Due to the nature of this assessment, we were only able to <br /> • generalize the scope of work for each correction; that is to say that detailed plans, <br /> quantities, and qualities of materials were not possible to be known. Our <br /> approach to this matter was to determine a preliminary cost projection suitable to <br /> the level of detail that is known. This process was similar to our typical approach <br /> for a cost projection that may be given to an owner during a schematic design <br /> stage of a project. <br /> Costs to correct deficiencies were computed for each building and compared to <br /> the building replacement cost to determine if the 15% requirement was met. The <br /> total number of buildings determined to be "structurally substandard" in this <br /> manner was compared to the total number of buildings in the district to determine <br /> if the 50% requirement was met. <br /> Individual building reports are available for review at the offices of SEH and Briggs & <br /> Morgan, St. Paul,Minnesota. <br /> Technical Conditions Resources—the following list represents the current building codes <br /> applicable to new buildings used in the Building Deficiency review: <br /> 1997 Uniform Building Code <br /> MN 1341 —Minnesota Accessibility Code, Chapter 1341 (1999) <br /> 2000 Minnesota Energy Code, Chapters 7672, 7674, or 7676 <br /> Minnesota Food Code, Chapter 4626 (1998) <br /> 1999 National Electric Code <br /> 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.