Laserfiche WebLink
Organizational Structure <br />June 14, 2004 Page 5 <br /> <br />We do not want to wait too long to move forward with a public works director and an <br />Engineering Department as we need to keep in mind our current state of development and <br />growth and the need to reduce the number of direct reports to me. If we wait for "enough" <br />employees to be added to the Street Department, Park Department, Police Department, etc. <br />before adding this position and department, it may never happen. <br /> <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br />This position is the one that is needed the most and in order to provide better customer <br />service by wa), of coordinating the Economic Development, Planning/Code Enforcement, <br />and Building/Environmental services and in order to free up some of my time. I hope that <br />everyone agrees with the need for establishing this position in the very near future. <br /> <br />The concerns with this position have mainly been cost and whether or not an internal <br />promotion takes place. The cost should not be an issue if this is a high enough priority for <br />the City Council. It is very acceptable to open up this position to all applicants. In this <br />manner, we may very well have excellent applicants from private industry or other cities that <br />would compete with our best internal applicants. On the other hand, an internal applicant <br />may rise to the top and be the best pick. In filling this position, the Council could use a <br />professional consulting f~rm that specializes in the recruitment, evaluation, and selection of <br />top candidates for key municipal positions. <br /> <br />As you could tell by the recent Brirneyer worksessions, a significant amount of the <br />discussion centered around growth activities. In general, a lot of our city growth and <br />development issues need to be better coordinated and communicated internally. There are <br />also some customer service issues that need to be dealt with daily and weekly. A director in <br />this area would result in significant hnprovements over our past practice. <br /> <br />PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR <br />As before, I am not recommending that the city establish and hire a public safe~' director. At <br />this time the cost in wages exceed the benefits that would be received by establishing this <br />position. Establishing this position would reduce the direct reports to me by only one <br />person. It is also questionable if this position would improve services being offered to the <br />public. The current coordination of activities and communication between the two <br />department heads (f~re chief and chief of police) is excellent-especially now that they are in <br />the same building. As noted in April, a number of communities have established this <br />position and over time gone away from it as not being cost effective or necessary. <br /> <br />GENERAL GOVERNMENT <br />At the April 12 meeting, this general government area was the "bubble" section of the <br />organizational chart. This general government area included the city clerk (and cable), <br />finance (and human resources and information technolo~'), prosecuting attorney, and the <br />liquor store. <br /> <br />The proposed organizational change in this "bubble" section moves information technology <br />and human resources out from under the Finance Department and put these positions on a <br />parallel level as to the finance director, liquor store manager, and city clerk. We currently do <br /> <br />S: \Council\Pat \ 20(~4\ Organizational06 1404.doc <br /> <br /> <br />