My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-13-2005 BA MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Minutes
>
2005
>
12-13-2005 BA MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 4:35:11 PM
Creation date
8/20/2015 4:35:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BAM
date
12/13/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MEETING OF THE ELK RIVER BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS <br /> HELD AT ELK RIVER CITY HALL <br /> TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2005 <br /> Members Present: Chair Anderson,Commissioners Lemke,Offerman,Ropp,Scott,Stevens <br /> and Westgaard <br /> Members Absent: None <br /> Staff Present: Community Development Director Scott Clark,Senior Planner Scott <br /> Harlicker,Planner Chris Leeseberg,City Engineer Terry Maurer, <br /> Environmental Administrator Rebecca Haug,and Recording <br /> Secretary Tina Allard <br /> 1. Call Meeting To Order <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the meeting of the Elk River Board of Adjustments <br /> was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Anderson. <br /> 2. Consider 12/13/05 Board of Adjustments Agenda <br /> MOVED BY COMMISSIONER STEVENS AND SECONDED BY <br /> COMMISSIONER ROPP TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 13,2005 BOARD OF <br /> ADJUSTMENTS AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> • 3.1. Request by Hassan 101.LLC to Appeal Staff's Interpretation of Section 30-859 of the City's <br /> Land Use Regulations.Regarding an Off-Premise Sign.Public Hearing-Case No.V 05-05 <br /> Mr. Harlicker stated the applicant is requesting a variance to staff's interpretation that a <br /> freestanding pylon sign is not allowed on Outlot A,Hals Addition.Mr. Harlicker explained <br /> that according to the zoning ordinance,the applicant's sign is considered a structure;and a <br /> structure is defined as a development;and therefore cannot be installed on the outlot as <br /> development is not allowed on an outlot. Mr.Harlicker further explained that the applicant's <br /> sign would not be allowed according to Section 30-859 of the Zoning Code regarding <br /> Prohibited Signs.He stated that Outlot A and an adjacent lot(728 Railroad Drive) are both <br /> owned by the applicant. <br /> Commissioner Ropp questioned the dimensions and appearance of the proposed sign. <br /> Mr.Harlicker stated he was not given that information. <br /> Chair Anderson opened the public hearing. <br /> Jim Gooley,representing the applicant-Stated he considered the outlot and the adjacent lot <br /> to be one lot. <br /> Chair Anderson closed the public hearing. <br /> Commissioner Lemke questioned if any other signage would be used at the site. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.