My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. BASR 05-25-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
05-25-2004
>
4.1. BASR 05-25-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 2:39:16 PM
Creation date
8/20/2015 2:37:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
5/25/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Board of Adjustments/V 04-03 <br /> May 25,2004 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • Pictures of Property <br /> Overview <br /> The property is located on Yankton Street with shoreline along the Elk River. Since the <br /> property is along the Elk River,it is included in the Shoreline District and subject to a 100 <br /> foot shoreline setback. The required front yard setback is 35 feet. <br /> In October 2003 the applicant's house was destroyed by fire. The front yard setback for that <br /> house ranged from 30 feet to 19 feet. The original structure was setback 19 feet from the <br /> front property line. In 1995 the applicant received a building permit to construct a large <br /> addition to the original house. The City approved a 30 foot front yard setback for the <br /> addition. The home complied with the 100 foot shoreline setback. The applicant is also <br /> proposing two small additions as part of their rebuilding plans; the rear addition to the house <br /> complies with setback requirements;the addition to the south end of the house is proposed <br /> to be at the same setback as the existing foundation (30ft.). <br /> The applicant would like rebuild on the existing foundation. <br /> Analysis <br /> In order to grant a variance from the literal interpretation of the ordinance, the following <br /> five conditions must be met: <br /> 1. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship. <br /> In 1995,when they applied for the building permit for the addition, the applicant <br /> received written approval from the city for the 30 foot front yard setback. Requiring <br /> them to dig up the old foundation and replace it 5 feet further back would force the <br /> house to encroach into the shoreline setback,require additional fill and removal of a <br /> terraced and landscaped patio. By moving the house closer to the river the neighbor's <br /> view of the river would be affected. Literal enforcement of the ordinance would cause <br /> undue hardship. <br /> 2. The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances, which are peculiar to the property and <br /> the structure involved and which are not characteristic of or applicable to, other lands or structure in the <br /> same area. <br /> The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances,which are peculiar to <br /> the property and the structure involved and which are not characteristic of or applicable <br /> to, other lands or structure in the same area. The fact that the house was destroyed by <br /> fire and the previously approved 30' setback are unique to this property. <br /> 3. The literal application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights enjoyed by <br /> other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. <br /> Other residences in this area encroach into the front yard setback <br /> S:\PLANNING\Case Files\2004\V 04-03 Olson\VO4-02BA5-25.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.