My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2003 BA MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Minutes
>
2003
>
08-20-2003 BA MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 11:01:51 AM
Creation date
8/19/2015 11:01:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BAM
date
8/20/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. LITERAL ENFORCEMENT WOULD NOT ALLOW THE APPLICANT TO <br /> • MODERNIZE HIS HOME. <br /> 2. THE HOUSE WAS ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED IN 1971 PRIOR TO <br /> THE CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENT. <br /> 3. OTHER RESIDENCES HAVE THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE MODERN, <br /> HEATED LIVING SPACES. <br /> 4. THE PLACEMENT OF THE HOUSE 65 FEET FROM THE SHORELINE <br /> WAS NOT AN ACTION OF THE PETITIONER. <br /> 5. THE REQUEST WOULD NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT OTHER <br /> PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY. <br /> AND THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS RELATING TO SHORELAND <br /> VARIANCES: <br /> 1. THE DENIAL OF THIS VARIANCE WOULD NOT ALLOW THE <br /> APPLICANT TO MODERNIZE HIS RESIDENCE. <br /> 2. THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE WOULD NOT BE HARMFUL TO <br /> THE SHORELINE IN THAT THE ADDITION WOULD NOT BE ANY <br /> CLOSER TO THE SHORELINE THAN THE EXISTING HOUSE. <br /> 3. THE HOUSE WAS CONSTRUCTED IN 1971 PRIOR TO THE CURRENT <br /> SHORELINE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. <br /> 4. THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE WILL NOT ALLOW A USE THAT <br /> IS NOT CURRENTLY ALLOWED IN THIS ZONING DISTRICT. <br /> 5. THE GRANTING OF THIS VARIANCE WILL NOT ALTER THE <br /> CHARACTER OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD. <br /> • COMMISSIONER ANDERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br /> CARRIED 5-0. <br /> 3.2. Request by July 7th Investments,LLC for a Parking Lot Setback Variance,Public Hearing— <br /> Case No.V 03-02 <br /> Staff report by Planner Chris Leeseberg. July 7th Investments requests a variance to reduce <br /> the driveway setback from ten feet to three feet in order to provide the required parking for <br /> a C2,Office District use. Mr.Leeseberg reviewed the five findings that must be met in <br /> order for approval of a variance,and explained how the applicant's request meets those five <br /> findings. Staff recommends approval of the request. <br /> Chair Pederson asked what the required rear setback would be. Mr.Leeseberg stated that a <br /> 10-foot setback is required. <br /> Chair Pederson opened the public hearing. <br /> Don Parson,applicant,stated that the parking area would be well within the required <br /> setback. Chair Pederson asked how many cars would be parking at the site. Mr.Parson <br /> stated that in the worst-case scenario,there would be six cars. Chair Pederson stated that he <br /> observed four cars in the driveway and four cars on the street earlier today. Mr.Parson <br /> stated that two brokers from other offices were there today,which does not happen on a <br /> normal day. <br /> Commissioner Ropp asked what type of business was located at the site. Mr.Parson stated <br /> that his office is a branch of Allied Home Mortgage. Commissioner Ropp asked if clients <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.