My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. ERMUSR 08-11-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2015
>
08-11-2015
>
4.2. ERMUSR 08-11-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2015 8:54:01 AM
Creation date
8/12/2015 12:21:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/11/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
This financial structure has led to tensions between ERMU and the city. For example, in 1987, a <br /> property tax levy limit left the city anticipating a budget deficit. ERMU had earned a profit from <br /> increased demand for services as the city grew. The city approached ERMU and asked that <br /> ERMU's $12,000 annual payment be increased to 5 percent of its retail sales, a sum of$163,000 <br /> that year. Since ERMU had begun purchasing electricity, it was concerned with maintaining <br /> competitive rates and General Manager Bill Birrenkott feared that such a large payment to the <br /> city would force a significant rate increase. The city responded that, much like a municipal liquor <br /> store, ERMU was an enterprise to fund the city government and its responsibilities were to the <br /> city as well as its customers. The two sides reached a compromise, with ERMU increasing its <br /> payment to $72,000. The city coffers were still short,but by much less than they would have <br /> been otherwise. Tensions like this have arisen from time to time,but in general, ERMU and the <br /> City of Elk River maintain a productive working relationship.85 <br /> During 1991, ERMU continued to expand its service area. General Manager Birrenkott <br /> spearheaded an initiative to extend its reach through a contract with Anoka Electric Cooperative <br /> for"the orderly transfer of service territory between the utilities,"meaning that ERMU would be <br /> able to expand its service area to include more customers in and around Elk River.86 Negotiated <br /> just before a large housing boom, ERMU was able to purchase rural service areas that have since <br /> been developed, adding greatly to ERMU's customer base. ERMU installed an additional <br /> substation in November 1991 to provide electricity more effectively. To further increase demand, <br /> ERMU loaned the city$55,000 to purchase lots in Industrial Park to attract new businesses.87 <br /> In April 1991,the Elk <br /> River City Council denied _ TT//y} <br /> a permit application by <br /> ERMU to expand its k 114 � ,� <br /> industrial building on the ,. �� ; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.