My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. ERMUSR 08-11-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2015
>
08-11-2015
>
4.2. ERMUSR 08-11-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2015 8:54:01 AM
Creation date
8/12/2015 12:21:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/11/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the background,however,was the question of the company's role in the ever-changing utilities <br /> industry. <br /> New Challenges, More Growth <br /> ; By the late 1960s, demand for power was <br /> w-' <br /> A escalating at a rate of over ten percent per year <br /> Because of the economics of scale, it was cheaper <br /> for Elk River to purchase electricity than to <br /> Nei <br /> { produce it Contract interconnection <br /> of ' _ requirements, however, forced Elk River to <br /> maintain sufficient generating capacity to operate <br /> I independently no surplus electricity was <br /> available. The Commission had little choice but <br /> '� to examine the feasibility of enlarging the power <br /> plant.74 <br /> In May 1969, Associated Consultants of <br /> Minneapolis reported that additional capacity <br /> could be accommodated at the site of Elk River's <br /> existing plant. Superintendent Halter apparently <br /> F decided that a new administration should oversee <br /> the changes: he retired in 1970, and was replaced <br /> f by William Patenaude. Patenaude was well <br /> acquainted with the Commission,having served <br /> _- as a Commissioner for twenty-one years.75 <br /> Superintendent Richard Halter with a new <br /> Westinghouse fluorescent streetlight,ca. 1965. Bids were opened for a new engine-generating <br /> These replaced mercury-vapor lights installed in unit on May 6, 1971. The Commission spent <br /> the mid-1950s. almost two months deliberating the decision. They <br /> (Evelyn Halter Photograph) ultimately awarded a contract for$708,113 for a <br /> 16-cylinder dual-fuel unit to the Worthington <br /> Corporation,but only after sending Rodney Anderson to New York to inspect one of the <br /> company's 5,000-kilowatt machines in operation. Anderson,who had worked as an operator in <br /> the power plant since 1951, was promoted to plant manager at about that time.76 <br /> Installation of the engine and related equipment was anticipated within 360 days. Associated <br /> Consultants was authorized to develop plans for nearly doubling the size of the power plant. By <br /> the end of 1971, the Commission had accepted bids of$98,250 from Magney Construction <br /> Company for the building expansion; $10,000 from Lemke Welding to install piping to provide <br /> cooling water from the river; and$153,295 from Premier Electric Construction Corporation to <br /> 74 Ibid. <br /> 75"Utilities Continues Tradition of Service It Started Here in 1916." <br /> 76 Associated Consultants,"History of Installation of Worthington SWCGO-16 Dual Fuel Electrical Generating Unit <br /> for the Municipal Electric Utility,Elk River,Minnesota,May 29, 1969-June 9, 1976," 1-3,in files of the Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities;Patenaude,August 14, 1972;Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Minutes,July 1, 1971; <br /> interview with Rodney Anderson,conducted by Weber,August 5, 1993. <br /> 90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.