My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.3. ERMUSR 08-11-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2014-2024
>
2015
>
08-11-2015
>
2.3. ERMUSR 08-11-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2015 12:17:18 PM
Creation date
8/12/2015 12:14:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/11/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROFIT AND LOSS NARRATIVE <br /> June 2015 <br /> Electric P&L <br /> June's electric kwh sales (for May usage) are up from the prior year by 1/2%overall: <br /> • Residential usage is down 7.5% <br /> • Small Commercial usage is up 5% <br /> • Large Commercial usage is up 2.9% from the prior year. <br /> June Operating Revenue is consistent with the prior year, down slightly by 3.84% for the <br /> month, down 1.74% for year-to-date numbers, and over year-to-date budgeted numbers <br /> by 1%. However, June 2014 had a PCA charge to customers of$131,000, and without <br /> considering this PCA charge, the revenue in June 2015 is up 1%compared to the prior <br /> year. <br /> Other Revenue is behind the prior year by 12%for June, for two reasons. The first reason <br /> is Security Revenue is down(however this is misleading and is explained below), and the <br /> second reason is we had May and June's MISO payments received in June of 2014, <br /> overstating June 2014's revenue. <br /> To better explain the first reason, Security Revenue is not down in sales,but the <br /> recognition of revenue is impacted by the annually billed accounts. In our previous <br /> software, when customers were billed annually the revenue for the year for that customer <br /> all showed up in that month. In our current software, when customers are billed annually <br /> the revenue is spread out evenly over the year. Each month of this year, as customers <br /> whose annual billing occurs in that month, that revenue starts in the month of the annual <br /> billing and is recognized over the next twelve months. All customers annually billed in <br /> June 2015 are showing 1/12 of the annual bill as revenue this month. All customers <br /> annually billed in June 2014 were showing all of it, 12/12 of the annual bill, as revenue <br /> that month. As the year progresses, and our annually billed security customers are all <br /> billed for their annual services, the revenue stream will grow and become more <br /> consistent. <br /> Overall, Total Revenues are behind the prior year by 4.34%, (and .27% ahead without <br /> considering the PCA of 2014.)Year-to-date revenues are behind 2%from the prior year <br /> (but ahead by 1.27%without considering the prior year pro-forma adjustment of <br /> $500,000.) <br /> Purchased Power is down from the prior year 4.75%. Last year there were significant <br /> PCA charges being passed along that we are not receiving this year(the PCA for June <br /> 2014 was $22,662, and year-to-date through June last year we had PCAs of$802,307.) <br /> Year-to-date the difference in costs for purchased power are 10%less than the prior year, <br /> and absent the PCA, 2.64%less than the prior year. <br /> 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.