Laserfiche WebLink
Though ERMU benefited from the UPA/CP merger,restructuring within the industry led to <br /> restrictions on how public utilities could use bond money. This threatened to dramatically <br /> increase taxes on ERMU. A federal bill, HR 721, was up for vote in 1999 to exclude public <br /> utilities from the restrictions. The bill amended the definition of"private business use" bonding <br /> to exclude "permitted open access transactions.""' This would allow for projects like the <br /> construction of electric facilities to be funded by bond money without increased taxes. If the bill <br /> was not passed, these restrictions would severely restrict how ERMU could use its bond money, <br /> which would limit expansion and restrict the quality of service. General Manager Bryan Adams <br /> wrote to Representative James Oberstar advocating for ERMU and other public utilities, noting <br /> that increased taxes would force ERMU to raise rates, leading to a loss of customers. He also <br /> argued that the bill protected ERMU's decision-making power in a changing industry. Adams <br /> lobbied for HR 721 because the legislation would give community-owned utilities power to <br /> improve services, and prevent private power companies from taking over their service area. <br /> While the bill was referred to the House Ways and Means Committee in February 1999, it did <br /> not return to the floor for a vote.112 <br /> A New Millennium <br /> In January 2000, the ERMU Commissioners heard updates on the gas turbine project as well as a <br /> landfill gas generation project with Sherburne County. Other projects in development included <br /> the closing of Well No. 6. This project was more expensive than anticipated because of <br /> engineering and sump pump fees, which added $10,000 to the project cost. 113 <br /> ERMU developed new long-term programs as its service area grew. One major initiative, <br /> authorized by the commission in March 2000, was the Wellhead Protection Plan (WHPP), which <br /> sought to seal unused wells and ensure that active wells met safety standards. The WHPP <br /> outlined a"protection area" in which contaminants from tainted wells would reach Elk River's <br /> aquifer within twenty years. Within this area, ERMU educated the public on maintaining safe <br /> wells and identifying abandoned wells on their property to prevent contamination of the aquifer. <br /> The commission also held public meetings about the WHPP program and brought in <br /> professionals from the Minnesota Rural Water Association to answer questions. Implementation <br /> of the WHPP was initially scheduled to last ten years,but was extended to twenty years in <br /> 2012.114 <br /> "I"H.R.721—Bond Fairness and Protection Act of 1999,"http://beta..congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/house- <br /> bill/721 (accessed April 21,2014). <br /> 112 Bryan Adams to Representative James Oberstar,letter,n.d.,ERMU files; "H.R.721—Bond Fairness and <br /> Protection Act of 1999." <br /> 13 Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Minutes,January 11,2000;John Linc Stine,Administrator,Minnesota <br /> Department of Natural Resources,to Robert J.McCartney,ERMU,letter,August 13, 1997;ERMU archival files. <br /> 14 ERMU, Wellhead Protection and Conservation(Elk River:published by the company, [2000]);Elk River <br /> Municipal Utilities Commission Minutes,March 14 and April 11,2000;ERMU,"Annual Report,"2012,n.p. <br /> 30 <br />