My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 08-03-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
08-03-2015
>
6.1. SR 08-03-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2015 8:54:32 AM
Creation date
7/31/2015 8:41:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> r 7 <br /> J. E. SUMPTER J. G. JACOBSON <br /> J.E. Sumpter and J. C.Jacobson <br /> (Sherburne County Star News,January 27, 1916) <br /> Less than a month after service began, Waterman boasted that the company's income was <br /> already covering operating expenses. The system's initial part-time service was increased to 24 <br /> hours a day, except on Sundays from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. A peak load of 70 kilowatts was soon <br /> dwarfed as the system rapidly expanded. By 1917, the company extended lines to Zimmerman <br /> after negotiating a twenty-five-year contract at a rate of 13 cents per kilowatt. A year or two <br /> later, a 150 KVA substation was constructed at Zimmerman, and a 13,200-volt line connected to <br /> Princeton. Princeton had installed a direct-current steam plant in 1899, but the facility was <br /> obsolete when alternating current became standard. Elk River Power and Light bought the old <br /> plant and retained it for auxiliary power, and converted Princeton's distribution lines from direct <br /> to alternating current. By 1922, the utility had 386 customers in Elk River, 60 in Zimmerman, <br /> and 390 in Princeton. Only some customers had meters; others were charged a flat monthly rate <br /> of one dollar. Plant operators worked twelve-hour days to earn $35 a month.31 <br /> Just as more and more people were growing dependent on the power system, an accident <br /> highlighted the fragility of the source. In August 1920, one of the dam's floodgates collapsed. <br /> The reservoir level dropped by about a foot before workers improvised a temporary gate with <br /> heavy wood planks. The system's voltage was maintained, perhaps with the aid of an auxiliary <br /> steam plant.32 The scare, however, might have convinced the 72-year-old Waterman, who was <br /> 31 "Power Plant Doing Well,"Sherburne County Star News,February 10, 1916;Seelhammer and Mosher, Growth of <br /> Sherburne County,327.For a discussion of Princeton's equipment, see Reuben B. Sleight, "Appraisal of the <br /> Property of Elk River Power and Light Company,Elk River,Minnesota,"prepared for the Minnesota Tax <br /> Commission,November 1922,in Minnesota Tax Commission records,State Archives,Minnesota Historical <br /> Society,Saint Paul.Elk River served Princeton until 1939,when Princeton installed its own municipal electric plant. <br /> Rate information is given in"Utilities Continues Tradition of Service It Started Here in 1916." <br /> 32 A court case in the early 1920s mentions"an auxiliary steam plant provided for use in cases of emergency"; see <br /> "Welsch et al.v.Elk River Power and Light Co.," syllabus by the Minnesota Supreme Court,January 4, 1924, in <br /> Northwestern Reporter 196(1924):650. <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.