My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. BASR 01-29-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
01-29-2002
>
3.1. BASR 01-29-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 2:01:54 PM
Creation date
7/23/2015 2:01:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
1/29/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Board of Adjustments <br /> January 29,2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> of about 98-feet and a rear lot line width of about 53-feet. The Elk River runs along the rear <br /> of the property and there are single-family dwellings on each side. There is an existing 24- <br /> foot wide by 32-foot deep dwelling approximately 57-feet from the front property line. <br /> There is no basement in the current dwelling. A new septic system,located just southeast of <br /> the dwelling, was installed in 1999 and will meet the city's requirement for the proposed <br /> addition. There are several mature trees around the site. <br /> Overview <br /> The proposed addition would include two bedrooms and one bathroom along with the <br /> garage addition as well as basement space for shelter during inclement weather. The <br /> addition would reduce the setback from 35-feet to 11-feet. <br /> According to the applicant's designer and contractor,building above the existing house is <br /> not an option, as the foundation would not be adequate enough to support the addition. <br /> Building to the rear of the house is not allowed,as it falls into the 100-foot setback from the <br /> ordinary high water mark of the Elk River. Building to the east is not an option as it is the <br /> location of the drain field. <br /> Staff provided an alternative design on the property but the applicant felt it would not suit <br /> the applicant's spatial needs.There was also discussion of putting the house addition above <br /> the proposed garage space, but this would not provide the basement space they desired. <br /> • Analysis <br /> In order to grant a variance from the literal interpretation of the ordinance,the following <br /> five conditions must be met: <br /> 1. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship. <br /> 2. The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances,which are peculiar to <br /> the property and the structure involved and which are not characteristic of,or applicable <br /> to, other lands or structure in the same area. <br /> 3. The literal application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the petitioner of <br /> rights enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. <br /> 4. The special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the petitioner's own <br /> action or inaction. <br /> 5. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health,safety or welfare of <br /> the residents of the city or the neighborhood where the property is located and will be in <br /> keeping with spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br /> Literal enforcement would require the applicant to place the garage and/or house addition in <br /> a location that may or may not suit the applicant's needs. <br /> S:\PLANNING\Case Files\V 02-01 Person\V02-01.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.