My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.9. SR 05-15-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2000
>
05/15/2000
>
6.9. SR 05-15-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:41 AM
Creation date
6/2/2004 8:06:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/15/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to the City CounciYCU 00-11 <br />May 15, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />(04) <br /> <br />A 19-foot tall monument sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Elk River Plaza 4tn <br />Addition, and an 8-foot tall monument sign on Lot 3, Block 2, Elk <br />River Plaza as shown on the approved site plan. <br /> <br />In the records, staff could not find an elevation of the approved 19-foot monument <br />sign or any notes on the site plan indicating the proposed sign height. The staff <br />memorandum indicated that the amount of sign area proposed was 80 square feet. <br /> <br />In preparation for the public hearing, staff prepared videotape simulating the <br />proposed pylon sign at the 19-foot height and a 30-foot height utilizing the Utilities <br />boom truck. Images were taken from the immediate surroundings and from <br />Highway 169. <br /> <br />Simulation Observations <br /> <br />Staff concluded from the simulation that a 19-foot high sign would not visible from <br />Highway 169 and would be below the existing conifer trees. A 30-foot sign would be <br />visible from Highway 169 and does not appear out of scale or character with its <br />surroundings. The proposed 30-foot sign would be smaller than the Burger King <br />sign to the north and would better fit the site. <br /> <br />Sien Area <br /> <br />City Ordinance defines sign area as: <br /> <br />...the area of the largest face including its border area. <br />If a sign has an irregular shape or has open spaces within <br />its border, the sign area shall be the area of the smallest <br />single rectangular figure that encloses it. If the sign is <br />composed of two or more individual cabinets or other <br />structures containing advertising messages, the sign area <br />shall be the sum of all the areas of the individual <br />cabinets or structures including their border areas <br /> <br />A comparison of signs along the Highway 169 corridor shows that the proposed sign <br />is most closely aligned with the Hillside Crossing development in regards to the <br />amount of commercial space, sign area and the number of tenants identified on the <br />sign. From this comparison, it appears that the request for greater sign area is <br />reasonable. <br /> <br />Development Height <br /> <br />Elk River Crossing 30 FT <br />Elk Park Center 30 FT <br />Hillside Crossings 2 (Menards) 27 FT <br />Hillside Crossings (Coburns) 24 FT <br />Proposed Sign 30 FT <br />Hillside Crossing Retail Center 25 FT <br /> <br />Width Sign Area # Tenants Approx. SF <br /> on sign Retail <br />16 FT 225 SF 4 400,000 SF <br />16.66 FT 200 SF 2 375,000 SF <br />34 FT 330 SF 4 247,745 SF <br />15 FT 101.05 SF 2 80,234 SF <br /> 13.33FT 126 SF 3 61,500 SF <br />10FT 150 SF 2 24,000 SF <br /> <br />\\elkriver\sys\shrdoc\planning\stevewen\ccmmo\cu00-11.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.