Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Minutes Page 7 <br />June 1, 2015 <br />---------------------------- <br />have colored doors when all the other buildings in the business park have white <br />doors. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated the vote on May 18, 2015, was a split vote but the <br />applicant was aware that this particular lot may not work for this business in this area <br />and was aware it may not be approved. Councilmember Westgaard felt this project <br />was too far off what was envisioned in this development. <br />Mayor Dietz polled the council on painting the garage doors taupe, the same color of <br />the building: yes: Councilmember Westgaard, Mayor Dietz; no: Councilmembers <br />Olsen, Wagner, and Burandt. <br />Discussion was held regarding the screening from view the roof equipment and what <br />would be a solution: painting the units, use of metal screening, or extending the <br />parapet. <br />Mr. Morrell stated he felt the rooftop equipment was positioned in such a way that it <br />would not be visible from the roadway or sidewalk, but until the road is in place and <br />elevation is determined, it would be hard to confirm at this time. <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated extending the parapet could solve the problem of <br />screening. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated the preferred method is the use of a parapet and would meet <br />the standards of the ordinance. <br />Mayor Dietz polled the council to allow painting of the roof equipment or require <br />screening it to be screened if it's visible: Councilmembers Westgaard, Olsen, and <br />Mayor Dietz: if it's visible it has to be screened. Councilmembers Wagner and <br />Burandt would allow painting the equipment. <br />Mayor Dietz polled the council and the majority of the council requires at least 30% <br />of a texture or material difference. The material can be the same and by a different <br />treatment of the surface and it can appear very different. <br />Mayor Dietz polled the council and the majority of the council didn't have an issue <br />with either the banding or the eve height. <br />Mr. Beck recommended the council pass a vote subject to the condition as discussed <br />and if the applicant is unable to work any details out with staff, he should come to a <br />future council meeting to discuss any concerns. <br />Moved by Councilmember Burandt and seconded by Councilmember Olsen <br />to approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Morrell Companies/')ferry <br />Morrell with the following conditions: <br />1. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement shall be developed <br />and signed by both the parties prior to issuance of a building permit. <br />P 0 1 1 R t I Rr <br />I'NATUREI <br />