06-01-2015 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Minutes Page 5 June 1, 2015 able to enter and exit the property without causing any traffic backups on Twin Lakes Parkway. Mr. Morrell stated there would be no problems with the truck traffic in and out of the property using Twin Lakes Parkway as is. Moved by Wagner and seconded by Councilmember Burandt to approve the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Morrell Companies/Terry Morrell with the following conditions: 1. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) agreement shall be developed and signed by both the parties prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. The CUP is not a building permit and the applicant must apply for and receive approval of required building and sign permits before construction may begin. 3. The building shall meet all building and fire codes. 4. The fire chief shall verify the location of all fire hydrants, and may require additional hydrants necessary to preserve the health and safety of the residents. 5. The applicant must apply for and receive approval of all required sign permits before signage may be installed. 6. All engineering/grading/drainage comments in the comment letter dated April 17, 2015, shall be addressed. 7. All sources of artificial lights shall be so fixed, directed, designed or sized that the minimum subtotal of their illumination will not increase the level of illumination on any nearby residential property by more than 0.1 foot-candle in or within 25 feet of a dwelling or by more than 0.5 foot-candle on any part of the property. 8. All driving areas and parking areas shall be bounded by B612 concrete curb and gutter. Motion failed 3-2 with Mayor Dietz, Councilmember Olsen and Councilmember Westgaard opposing. Councilmember Westgaard expressed his desire to maintain Business Park architectural standards. Councilmember Olsen stated he also supports adhering to business park standards and does not understand why those standards cannot be achieved for this project. Counselor Beck requested staff refresh the council's memories on what the specific areas of compliance were needed regarding business park standards. He stated the council would then have alternatives on how to proceed either by a motion to direct staff to prepare a resolution for denial based upon non-compliance of those standards, or there could be a motion to approve subject to compliance to those standards. He stated council needs to indicate to the applicant the exact requirements the council is requiring of this project in order to comply with business park standards.