My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. HRSR 10-04-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
10-04-2004
>
5.1. HRSR 10-04-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2015 4:53:51 PM
Creation date
6/11/2015 4:18:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
10/4/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of work completed for each permit(building, electrical, or plumbing, etc.) and, in some <br /> cases, scope of work and approximate value of work to be completed. Additional <br /> ' building data was collected from public taxpayer information available from Sherburne <br /> County. Building data from these public records was combined with and reviewed <br /> against information gathered in the field. <br /> QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS <br /> The properties were surveyed and evaluated to ascertain whether the qualification tests <br /> for tax increment eligibility for a redevelopment district,required under the following <br /> Minnesota Statutes, could be met. <br /> ' Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause(a) (1)requires two tests for <br /> occupied parcels: <br /> 1. Coverage Test—"parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are <br /> occupied by buildings, streets,utilities,paved or gravel parking lots or similar <br /> structures. . ." <br /> Note: The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defmed under <br /> Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (e) which states: "For <br /> ' purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets,utilities, <br /> paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15%of the area of the <br /> parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities,paved or gravel parking lots or other <br /> similar structures.' <br /> 2. Condition of Buildings Test—" . . . and more than 50 percent of the buildings,not <br /> including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial <br /> renovation or clearance;" <br /> The term`structurally substandard', as used in the preceding paragraph, is defmed by <br /> a two-step test: <br /> ' Conditions Test: Under the tax increment law, specifically, Minnesota Statutes, <br /> Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause(b), a building is structurally <br /> substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of <br /> ' deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection <br /> including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar <br /> factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify <br /> substantial renovation or clearance." <br /> Code Test: Notwithstanding the foregoing, the tax increment law, specifically, <br /> ' Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause(c) also provides that <br /> a building may not be considered structurally substandard if it: ". . . is in <br /> compliance with building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified <br /> ' to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of <br /> • constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site." <br /> o <br /> i <br /> ' 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.