My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.2. SR 06-01-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
06-01-2015
>
8.2. SR 06-01-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2015 8:15:50 AM
Creation date
5/29/2015 7:56:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/1/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Measuring Progress <br />Routine evaluation of the parks and recreation system is valuable, particularly <br />when justifying requests for funds, facilities, staff time and volunteers. <br />It is also important to proactively communicate benefits provided by the park <br />and recreation system to ensure elected officials, other decision makers and the <br />public have a thorough understanding of the benefits the system provides and the <br />number of people positively impacted by the parks and recreation system. <br />Regular evaluations also have the potential for pinpointing which improvements <br />would better serve system users and identifying benchmarks for excellence. <br />Comprehensive evaluations of parks and recreation systems should include both <br />qualitative and quantitative components. Some qualitative tools, such as surveys, <br />are relatively easy to conduct and are important in gauging satisfactions, trends, <br />and need. Surveys do not tell the entire picture though. The use of quantitative <br />methods, such as counts, are important in capturing the who, what, where, and <br />when ofparks and recreation use. Counts are the most beneficial in demonstrating <br />the magnitude of usage. Finally, the evaluation system should also include an <br />analysis of the community's progress on its goals and implementation of its plans. <br />Following are types of quantitative and qualitative data that should be collected <br />as part of a comprehensive evaluation or progress. <br />> Quantitative Data <br />• Number of recreation activities and participants tracked through <br />registrations. <br />• Numberofevents, facilityusersandparticipants tracked through reservations, <br />permitting, and through usage requests by associations. <br />• Number of volunteer participants. <br />• Number of people using parks, trails, and other facilities through the <br />development of a user count program. This program might be accomplished <br />by counting cars in the parking lot, creating a neighborhood park count <br />volunteer program, or installing new technology to count trail users. <br />• Number of signature and other park master plans completed. <br />• Miles of sidewalks /trails completed. <br />• Park and trail safety — number of accidents, incidents, and crime. <br />• Evaluation of species diversity, parcel size, and connectivity in our natural <br />resource areas to guide our natural resource management efforts. <br />.. ........................................................ .............................., <br />Chapter 6: Implementation 86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.