3.1. HRSR 07-28-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Special HRA Minutes Page 2 June 30,2003 Hanson of MetroPlains Development further explained why the MHFA application is necessary to make the project financially feasible. Ms.Mehelich stated that while the MHFA application needs to be submitted,receipt of the funds will be contingent on the HRA and developer reaching a final development agreement. The HRA directed staff and MetroPlains to prepare the list of development agreement issues. Ms. Mehelich requested that the HRA identify any issues that need to be addressed as part of a final development agreement with MetroPlains. Commissioner Motion asked that the following issues be addressed in the final development agreement: • Clarification of proposed parking&transitional parking • Description of proposed walking path,etc. along river • Confirmation of project timeline&penalty for non-performace • Description of visual access to river from lower level on Bluff Block design Chair Toth inquired about whether or not the building of a parking ramp behind the Brick Block has been researched. Ms. Mehelich explained that a smaller surface level ramp was researched for the rear Brick Block concept but not the Jackson and Bluff Block concepts. Ms. Mehelich provided the following summary of parking options during project construction: • Dares Funeral Home parking lot • Remove Elk River Municipal Utilities building&close off King Ave. • City green space east of Sunshine Depot • • Contractor parking in city lots north of Hwy 10 COMMISSIONER MOTIN MOVED TO SUPPORT METROPLAINS AND THE CITY IN SUBMITTING A MULTIFAMILY AND HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY AND THAT THE HRA RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ALSO SUPPORT THE APPLICATION AND FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION TO A LETTER OF INTENT TO TRANSFER THE CITY-OWNED JACKSON BLOCK PROPERTY. COMMISSIONER WILSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. COMMISSIONER MOTIN MOVED TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE A LIST OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ISSUES TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE HRA FOR CONSIDERATION. COMMISSIONER THOMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. 4. Review&Comment on Downtown Design Standards Planner Chris Leeseberg reported that the HRA requested to review the Downtown Design Guidelines for a second time. The HRA reviewed the first draft in March and provided several issues of concern. Several HRA members expressed that the guidelines were too restrictive and asked if MetroPlains would have a problem complying with the new standards. Commissioner Thompson mentioned that MetroPlains should have been invited to all Planning • Commission meetings regarding the design standards. Mr.Leeseberg explained that MetroPlains had been consulted throughout the process but that developers are typically not