My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HRSR INFORMATION 05-27-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
05-27-2003
>
HRSR INFORMATION 05-27-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2015 2:52:56 PM
Creation date
5/28/2015 2:44:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
5/27/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHECKLIST FOR MEASURING PERFORMANCE 3 <br /> • publications, and we interviewed several housing organizations in Minnesota. In <br /> the following checklist,we converted the performance measures to"yes or no" <br /> questions to make it easier for cities to conduct a self-assessment. The measures <br /> are presented in an order that corresponds with the best practices recommended in <br /> Chapter 2. <br /> The following checklist is by no means exhaustive. Cities could track many other <br /> measures to evaluate their housing programs. Cities may choose to supplement <br /> the measures listed here with additional measures related to their own specific <br /> objectives. Even though each measure appears below only once, some measures <br /> may apply to more than one practice. For example,tracking the number of code <br /> violations voluntarily resolved as a percentage of all identified code violations <br /> applies to administering both local housing-related codes and the State Building <br /> Code. <br /> Checklist of Performance Measures <br /> Determine housing needs (p. 31 in Chapter 2) <br /> The following performance measures pertain to the best practices for identifying <br /> housing needs: collecting and analyzing information in the context of long-range <br /> planning and strategic thinking. <br /> Yes No <br /> A. Has the city assessed the overall number,age,condition,and C <br /> • appearance of housing units? <br /> B. Has the city identified the substandard housing units in its C ❑ <br /> jurisdiction,by owner-occupied and rental units if <br /> appropriate? <br /> C. Has the city determined the percentage of the housing stock p p <br /> that is boarded up or abandoned? <br /> D. Does the city monitor the percentage of condemned(for p 1 <br /> health and safety reasons)housing units in its jurisdiction? <br /> E. Has the city analyzed the neighborhoods in its jurisdiction to <br /> learn what is encouraging or discouraging private investment <br /> in existing housing (including data on the history,property <br /> conditions and values,housing needs,housing policies and <br /> programs, and real estate market)? <br /> F. Has the city assessed whether local ordinances and policies G J <br /> are hindering private investment in housing preservation? <br /> G. Has the city identified its housing needs? p <br /> H. Has the city set priorities among its identified housing needs? p _1 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.