My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. BASR 09-29-1998
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
09-29-1998
>
3.1. BASR 09-29-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2015 9:37:10 AM
Creation date
5/13/2015 9:37:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
9/29/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Board of Adjustments/V 98-11 <br /> September 29, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> • Variance <br /> Staff refers the Board to Section 900.40 of the City of Elk River Code of <br /> Ordinances for the five standards to consider when reviewing a variance. A <br /> variance may be granted only if it meets the following five conditions: <br /> 1. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship. <br /> 2. The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances which <br /> are peculiar to the property and the structure involved and which are <br /> not characteristic of, or applicable to, other lands or structure in the <br /> same area. <br /> 3. The literal application of the provisions of this ordinance would <br /> deprive the petitioner of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same <br /> district under the terms of this ordinance. <br /> 4. The special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the <br /> petitioner's own action or inaction. <br /> 5. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health, <br /> • safety or welfare of the residents of the City or the neighborhood where <br /> the property is located and will in keeping with spirit and intent of the <br /> ordinance. <br /> The applicant states the hardship is that by requiring a 10 foot setback on <br /> the north and west sides there would not be enough room to allow for two <br /> way traffic flow. The proposed layout of the site is what creates the situation <br /> where a variance is needed. If the parking lot was layout was revised and the <br /> distance between the parking lot and the building reduced, there would be <br /> enough room on the west side to meet the 10 foot setback requirement. There <br /> is 66 feet between the proposed location of the building and the west property <br /> line. If 10 feet is subtracted for the setback, 24 feet subtracted for the aisle <br /> and 18 feet subtracted for the parking stall, there is 14 feet left between the <br /> parking lot and the building. On the proposed plan there is approximately 20 <br /> feet between the parking lot and the building. <br /> On the north side, if the building was shifted 5 feet to the south, the <br /> applicant would be able to meet the 10 foot setback requirement on the north <br /> side. However, the variance is needed on the north side in order to allow the <br /> placement of the building as shown on the site plan reviewed by the Planning <br /> Commission and HRA. <br /> • <br /> s:\planning\scott\v98-11.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.