My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION #3 04-17-2000
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2000
>
04/17/2000
>
INFORMATION #3 04-17-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:40 AM
Creation date
5/17/2004 8:43:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/17/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34.00 CITY CENTER <br />33 SOUTH SIXTH STREET <br />MINNEAPOLIS, MN S54.02-3796 <br /> <br />612 343-2800 <br />FAX: 612 333-0066 <br />WEB SITE: www. gpmlaw.¢om <br /> <br />CONJIILTING OFFICE, BFIIING CHINA <br /> <br />Peter K. Beck <br />612 343-5374 <br />peter.beck(~gmplaw.com <br /> <br />April 13, 2000 <br /> <br />Bradley Larson <br />Metcalf, Larson & Muth, P.A. <br />313 West Broadway <br />P.O. Box 46 <br />Monticello, MN 55362-0446 <br /> <br />Re: George and Carol Deschenes Property <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Larson: <br /> <br /> This letter is in response to your letters of February 25, 2000 and March 9, 2000 <br />to Bud Storm with Evergreen Land Services Company regarding the Deschenes Property. <br /> <br /> First, with respect to your letter °fFebruary 25. The storage building which you <br />speak of is a Permanent Improvement to real property and was thus included in the city's <br />appraisal and acquisition of the Deschenes Property. Consequently, the city has paid for <br />this building and will not give it away or allow its removal. It certainly will not pay <br />relocation costs for a structure it has already paid for. Therefore, Mr. Deschenes may not <br />move this building, at least not until all issues related to the acquisition of the Deschenes <br />property and the payment of relocation expenses are fully and finally settled and agreed <br />to. <br /> <br /> With respect to your letter of March 9, 2000, Michael Deschenes, his wife and <br />their businesses were served with the condemnation petition. The city's estimated <br />maximum relocation costs forwarded to you under cover of my letter dated January 4, <br />2000 (copy enclosed) does specify the city's estimated maximum relocation costs for <br />their businesses and residential tenancy. It was our understanding that you represented <br />all of the family members, including Michael and Annette. This is why we included the <br />city's estimated maximum relocation costs for their businesses and residential tenancy in <br />the letter to you dated January 4, 2000. <br /> <br />GRAY, PLANT, MOOTY, MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. ATTORNEYS .~r l.,4w <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.