Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission k4eef;i?M,nutes . .~.'1 <br />h4ay 23, 1995 Page 8 <br /> <br /> conservation and results in a tax benefit tc~ the developer, perhaps some type of <br /> park dedication fee could be required. <br /> <br /> Commissioner Minton stated that he would be in favor of an access from the <br /> northern streets to the northern trail. , . · <br /> <br /> Chair Kuester opened the public h~afing'~ <br /> - . . ; . _.. . . ..... ,~ ~.'~ <br /> Robert Elvem, 19623 Proctor Avenue NW, expressed his concern that there be <br /> sidewalks along the main thoroughfares in the development for children walking <br /> · to school. He also was concerned abater Increased traffic on Proctor,' Mr. Elveru <br /> ': :' ' questioned how water pressure ~ouId be maintained in the development due to <br /> the high elevation. · .... <br /> <br /> Mike Dwyer, 19623 Proctor Avenue NW, 'stated that he owns a lot on the <br /> ' northeast comer of the proposed degelopment. He explained that his lot was <br /> included in the proposed extension of the urban service boundary and <br /> questioned the impact this would have on his property. He further questioned if <br /> there are any plans for the 40 acres southeast of the proposed development. He <br /> also questioned how a park could be developed with the steep grade of'Outlot <br /> A. Finally, he questioned how the area would be serviced by City water. <br /> <br /> Beverly Putnam, 19571 Proctor Avenue NW, stated that her home is located <br /> directly across from the proposed entrance to the development. She expressed <br /> concern regarding the increased traffic on Proctor, speeding and trucks traveling <br /> <br /> Jim Hamilton, 19711 Rush Street, Ridgewood Addition, expressed his concern with <br /> the density of the proposed development. He felt it would have a detrimental <br /> impact on his properly value. <br /> <br /> Bob Eiveru, 19623 Proctor Avenue, also expressed his concern for the density of <br /> the proposed development, and the affect this many families would have on the <br /> traffic problems they are already experiencing. <br /> <br /> John Boggart, representing the developer, explained that given the proposed 100 <br /> foot buffer zone, there would be approximately 150 feet between Mr. Hamilton's <br /> rear lot line and a potential neighbor's home to the south. <br /> <br /> Ran Bastyr, developer, stated that there will also be a drop in elevation between <br /> his property and the lots to the south. <br /> <br />Mike Dwyer, 19623 Proctor, questioned whether or not his property would be <br />included in the rezoning, since it was included in the extension of the urban <br />service area. <br /> <br />Bob Elveru, 19623 Proctor, questioned whether or not the school system would be <br />adequate to handle the number of children coming into this development. He <br />asked if there were other costs to residents that they may not be aware of now. <br /> <br />Chair Kuester closed the public hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />