6.8. SR 05-17-2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

March 10, 2004 -App]J. cant 'wi~dzaws PLTD smd ~ appiicanons and proceeds fom'~d with cra'rent !R. lc ZOn~g. March 10, 2004 Park & Aec -The Commission was updated on the revised 111 lot plan. (update) -The Commission s:21 asked for ~e 200-foot wide buffer (property line to property line) based on the number derived from the original 1'~0 lot PUD. -The Commission is willing to work wkh applicant to pm'chase the 1.89 acres they desire or if needed, ask the Council to condemn the land. -The Commission also discussed City Code Section 30- 375(3) which discussed appropriateness of the site for development. March 23, 2004 Planning -Staff, in the akernoon prior to the meeting, wo&ed with Commission applicant on a design that provided a parallel buffer that is Meeting, 147-feet wide (10% land dedication). Both staff and Public applicant felt the design was a fair compromise as it did Hearing provide 200-feet of buffer from trail edge to the back of lots. -Staff presented the 111 lot plat that is in compliance with the current tKlc district. -The Commissions consensus was the site was .not suitable for due level of deve2opment and a more creative Rlc layout can be achieved with less impact on the environment. -The Rlc plat request was recommended for denial based on the fact that the physical characteristics of the site are not suitable for the type and density of development and k wzll cause substantial environmental damage with the loss of trees. April 14, 2004 Park & Rec -Asked to reaffirm their recommendation. (update) -Commission still believes the ske is not appropriate for a development of this nature. -Discussion centered on playgound location and that it would be best in the clearing of Lot-4, Block-4 & Oudot G. (this appears to be physically not possible) -To compensate lost lots, allow lots (out of buffer) at horde end of proposed park. -They realize the buffer would be now less than the 147- feet but suggested a 20' conse~adon easement over the rear setback of the lots adjacent to the buffer. -Suggested multiple other considerations April 19, 2004 'City -The applicant is b~4nging fo~ard the ori=4nal submitted Council 1Klc layout that was presented to Planning Commission on Meeting March 23, 2004. -Again the plat has 5.35 acres of park land (which exceeds the park dedication by .25 acres) varies in widd2 from $5- feet to 290-feet. -Once the applicant gets clear direction from the Council, he will work with staff to design a parallel buffer that meets park dedication.