My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.6. SR 04-06-2015
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2015
>
04-06-2015
>
4.6. SR 04-06-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2015 10:21:38 AM
Creation date
4/3/2015 10:21:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/6/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
G. Monitoring and Reporting <br />The Finance Director shall annually review with the City Council the status of the fund <br />balances with this policy and present it to the City Council in conjunction with the <br />development of the annual budget and /or other long -term financial planning documents <br />such as the CIP. <br />The city will annually review the adequacy of the reserve balances. <br />The city will periodically review updates to rating agency methodologies and medians to <br />make sure that the reserve policy is consistent to ensure maintaining its existing rating or <br />that it positions itself for an upgrade. <br />Debt <br />The City of Elk River has chosen, by policy, to guide its issuance of debt by following the guidelines <br />listed below. These practices were identified through examination of materials from state statutes, <br />bond rating agencies, and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA). This policy can <br />be amended in the future by the City Council, but is consistent with general municipal practices at <br />the time of its adoption. <br />In accordance with the authorities cited in the background section, the City of Elk River will use the <br />following policies in determining when and how to use debt for financing capital and equipment <br />needs. <br />A. Debt Limits <br />1. Legal Limits: <br />a. Minnesota Statutes, Section 475 prescribes the statutory debt limit that outstanding <br />principal of debt cannot exceed 3% of taxable market value. This limitation <br />applies only to debt that is wholly tax - supported. The type of debt included is <br />either general obligation debt of any size bond issue (G.O.) or lease revenue bond <br />issues that were over $1,000,000 at the time of issuance. However, there are also <br />several other types of debt that do not count against the limit. G.O. tax increment, <br />G.O. abatement G.O. special assessment, G.O. utility revenue, and most HRA or <br />EDA- issued debt is considered to have a separate revenue source other than just <br />taxes and so are excluded from the legal debt limit calculation. HRA and EDA <br />public project revenue bonds or lease revenue bonds with financing lease <br />agreement with a city or county do count against the statutory debt limit. <br />b. Local ordinances do not limit the city's ability to issue debt. <br />2. Policy Limits: <br />a. Uses of Debt: Debt will be used only for capital costs. The city will not utilize <br />debt for cash flow borrowing, even though this is allowed by state statutes. <br />b. CIP and Financial Planning: The city's capital improvement plan shall contain <br />debt assumptions which match this policy and requires a commitment to long <br />range financial planning which looks at multiple years of capital and debt needs. <br />c. Tax Increment Bonds: The city shall use G.O. tax increment bonds only when the <br />development merits special consideration. <br />Financial Management Policies Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.