Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Personnel Committee: <br />Joan Schmidt <br />Bruce West <br /> <br />Dave Potvin <br />Lori Johnson <br /> <br />DATE: May 17, 2004 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Consider Personnel Committee Recommendations <br /> <br />Item 4.6. <br /> <br />The Personnel Committee has reviewed several positions lately and is prepared to make <br />recommendations to the City Council based on the results of job analysis questionnaires (jAQ) <br />completed by each of these employees. Each of these positions meets the city's criteria for review. <br />Below is a list of positions reviewed, the reason for the review, and the Committee's <br />recommendation for each position. For your reference, background information on how the <br />positions are reviewed by the Committee is attached. <br /> <br />Position Reviewed <br /> <br />Reason <br /> <br />Committee Recommendation <br /> <br />· Environmental <br /> Assistant <br /> <br />One Year Review <br /> <br />74 points <br />Pay Grade 1E; $41,932.31 to $55,180.06 <br /> <br />~dd#i//o,a/ Comme,/s: <br />Rebecca Haug started as the Environmental Assistant on August 13, 2002. The Personnel <br />Committee started the review process for this position in July 2003 which is the standard timeframe <br />for review of new positions. The initial jAQ completed by Rebecca was submitted to PDI (the <br />consulting firm) in August 2003. However, PDI encountered some computer problems when <br />processing the jAQ. In the end, the position profile went through several revisions both by PDI <br />and by Rebecca and her supervisor Steve Rohlf before the final position profile was received by the <br />Personnel Committee in December, 2003. The Committee completed a more thorough review than <br />normal to make sure that everything was correct given the many revisions that had been made to the <br />position profile. Unfortunately, the process to review her position took much longer than normal. <br />However, the Committee understood that an agreement had been made with Rebecca at the time of <br />hire that she would receive a pay increase on July 1, 2003. As you know, the Personnel Committee <br />does not make pay recommendations; however, the Committee fully supports retroactive pay for <br />this position because of the hiring agreement and of the delay in the Personnel Committee's <br /> <br />S:\Council~Lori~2OO4~PcrsonnelComm051704.doc <br /> <br /> <br />