My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. SR 05-17-2004
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2004
>
05/17/2004
>
4.2. SR 05-17-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:33:37 AM
Creation date
5/14/2004 7:28:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/17/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OPINION <br /> <br />+12. A MONOAY. MAY 3. 2004 <br /> <br />EDITORIALS <br /> <br />COMMUTER RAIL <br /> <br />Put Northstar line <br />back in bonding bill <br />Minnesota's transportation needs should not be a <br />partisan issue. In its 2001 comprehensive trans- <br />portation plan, the Metropolitan Council noted that <br />citizens identified traffic congestion was the .No. 1 <br />quality of life issue, that the rate of congestion was <br />increasing, at an ever more rapid rate and that <br />between 2000 and 2025, the metro area is expected to <br />gain aboht 635,000 people and 312,000 jobs. <br /> The Minnesota Legislature must quit partisan <br />game-playing with the funding need for the North- <br />star Corridor heavy rail project between the Cities <br />and Big Lake. It was disappointing last week to see <br />the House's $678 million construction budget exclude <br />the Northstar project's needed $37.§ million in state <br />money. It is predictable that the DFL:controlled Sen- <br />ate will step forward with Northstar money and tout <br />its contrasting priorities in the safer political envi- <br />ronment of a non-election year for senators. <br /> We understand and support the concept of fiscal prUdence <br />with state money, especially when it is borrowed. But we also <br />understand that deferral is different from prudence when con- <br />sidering the economic and environmental future of Minnesota. <br /> In the House, the tightwad faction among Republicans is in <br />serious denial about multimodal transportation as both life-qual- <br />ity and economic imperatives. The bus solution up U.S. 10, they <br />saY, would be cheaper. But it makes little sense to add to the jams <br />on an already congested highway when existing train tracks and <br />major federal money are available to add an efficient option with <br />commuter rail. The true believers in only roads and bridges <br />should also realize that it would cost twice as much to widen U.S. <br />10 as to develop and maintain train service. <br /> Northstar Commuter Rail would be funded by federal, state <br />and local sources at an annual cost of about $10.4 million, using <br />existing tracks to provide about 5,600 rides a day between down- <br />town Mirmeapolis and Big Lake (just south of St. Cloud). It's time <br />to get rolling on the $265 million Northstar Corridor capital proj- <br />ect. The difficulties of pollution and congestion in the northerh <br />exurban corridor and the needs for workers who commute to the <br />Cities aren't diminishing. They are growing. <br /> More enlightened Republicans, including Rep. Kathy Tin- <br />glestad of Andoverj who has advocated doggedly for Northstar, <br />should be appointed by Speaker Steve Sviggum when the confer- <br />ence committee is formed to reconcile the House and Senate ver- <br />sions of this year's construction funding bills. <br /> Sviggum and Gov. Tim Pawlenty, both Republican converts to <br />the Northstar, should have the clout to ensure the Northstar Cor- <br />ridor ends up with the state money that will make the first part <br />of the project possible. We encourage them to use it on behalf of <br />Northstar. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.